Reader comments
Texas judge refuses to sign order to return FLDS children
198 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
59 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







Not all families are the same - they should be treated individually - the appeals court already found that and this judge has an obligation to follow their ruling.
The parents of the girl in the picture kissing Jeffs should have greater restrictions than say that nice two parent EMT trained family.
A 17 year old boy probably doesn't need a medical exam, but instead would need his educational needs monitored. A 12 year-old girl may need to meet with an offsite CPS worker-but maybe not a infant.
What if they want to leave FLDS and go live with family in Utah? Why can't they do that?
No evidence, just suppositions and prejudice.
Depriving people of liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is plainly unconstitutional.
The parents should sue the judge and the authorities, for damages.
Also, the way the authorities approached the community with tanks, heavy weapons, and trigger ready people clearly put the kids in danger of harm, but they don't see that.
Blind people following the dark visions of their own delusional ideas of grandeur.
If the CPS wants to conduct an investigation and put restrictions on the parents, then they must follow the law in individual cases separate and apart from the matter of the children's immediate return.
Am I correct?
If there are children in danger, then conduct the investigation normally. Use the tools provided by the laws of Texas. It is as if the CPS and Judge Walther don't believe in the law. CPS and the Judge don't seem to believe the rule-of-law is the best course of action. Judge Walther wears the garments of the law, but has the expedient heart of a criminal.
Considering the seriousness of identifying underaged mothers and their abusers, Judge Walthers requests are reasonable.
Please sombody show me the abused children in that compound. Where are they? Rush to judgement.
God Help America. She is Hurting.
Lets not forget that if the FLDS did not have this practice of underage marriage that we would't be going through all of this. THEY MUST STOP THIS PRACTICE
One person commented a few days ago, that once the state gets control of the children, the parents would have a hard time getting the them returned. That seems to be true here. Control is the issue.
There will be more twists and turns... with the outcomes ...