Reader comments
Shurtleff backs delay on same-sex ruling
46 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
59 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







More California voters now support allowing same-sex marriage than oppose it, according to a new poll released Wednesday.
The results mark the first time in more than three decades of polling by the Field Poll that more California voters have approved of extending marriage to gay couples than have disapproved
but California's judges are not about reason or justice, it is all about the attention and power.
Heres to living your fantasy rith.
And Desnews. You have a clear ruling about URLs... why was the GLBT URL allowed????
By the way, if this poll is true, which I doubt, it is not progress, it is a sad day...
Now Ben can make an honest man out of Jerry.
Tell me, under this new "enlightened" approach to marriage, how, exactly, do we define it? How does one claim that the marriage of two same-gendered individuals is more valid than, say, the marriage of a father and a son? Is it that same sex marriage doesn't break ever-standing biological and societal boundaries? Is it that incest is "gross" and wrong while homosexuality isn't? Perhaps the mere fact there hasn't yet been an Incest Rights movement makes gay marriage more valid?
I genuinely sympathize with the plight of gays and lesbians, but banning reason as hate while undermining a virtually universal human social structure is not nearly as "progressive" as progressives try to make it sound.
The other problem for California is the idiot Jerry Brown that the as usual uninformed California voters voted in as attorney general.
So if same-sex marriage were not legal in those countries, more gays would be having kids in a heterosexual marriage? Are you serious? Explain this to me how this would work, please.
Your god and the stories about his laws are only relevant to those of you who believe in them. Your points are moot as far as the rest of us are concerned. You cannot abandon that which you have never embraced. So, who is the "we" that are abandoning god?
If you're reasoning is that it's unnatural, that means nothing. Whether or not something is natural doesn't determine its morality, since Cancer is natural and medicine is unnatural.
I personally think that homosexuality is immoral and will teach my kids that same thinking, but if you're trying to justify a law you need a different reason.