Reader comments
Gay Mormons to church: Don't fight California court ruling
48 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Committee will explore new '22...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Gay rights and religious liberty
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







You can't be an active homosexual and a member of the church.
The article is really about an activist group that thinks it is for gay rights on behalf of gay Mormon�s (an oxymoron).
Again... gay marriage isn't about rights, it is about the redefinition of marriage.
Next you'll be demanding that church's are forced to marry gays or else....
Look. You have indoctrinated the youth of this country in schools for years. Enough to where many of these indoctrinated youth are now at voting age and think it is normal to be gay. It isn't. But they think it is.
Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman.
You have usurped rights of cohabitation. This was won mostly by combining the voting with laws that included cohabitation of man and woman too. Many who shack up want their tax breaks as well and other so called rights.
But for them it is an option to me married, because they fit the definition.
You have made it the focus point, but again the DEFINITION of marriage precludes the perversion of homosexuality from being joined together.
I think that the Mormon Church should oppose and fight ALL forms of immoral perversion.
I agree, people should be sensitive in their dealings with each other, gay or not.
I don't agree with saying God was wrong in establishing his commandments, though. None of us would be here if he hadn't.
I see LDS people hating gay people because of this.
I pray that we can be kind and loving toward those friends and family members who deal with this issue. But I support the teaching of the LDS Church, as well as other tradational churches, and the Bible, on this issue. And I have faith that a loving Heavenly Father can and (someday) will sort this out--we may have to wait for the resurrection to see that, but then I am waiting for the resurrection for my handicapped son, too.
The Church believes in Standing for Something; and being a Beacon of Truth and Light in a base and wicked world.
Don't fear or hide from the Truth, embrace it and it will set you free.
Homosexuality is harmful.
Homosexual marriage is harmful to society.
Don't put the Light under a bushel.
Also, the LDS church does not teach to hate gay people, it teaches to hate the sin, not the sinner.
It strikes at the very definition of marriage.
If the church doesn't speak out now, when will they speak out, when the government requires that the church must perform and accept gay marriages or lose their right to be considered a church?
Fact 2: It is not our place to council God, this church is led by a living Prophet, and we don't go to him with our vote of what is and isn't acceptable in the standards. We are all going to have issues, I had a boss who said he would go inactive if they ever put another temple in Utah, that was before the ones that are being built right now.
Fact 3: We have the LDS church, they have accepted the council of a living prophet, there is the FLDS church, they choose to live a different lifestyle, yet claim to be part of the church. Maybe there needs to be the GayLDS church, they can have their own prophet, like Jeff's and they can do what they want, yet profess to be Mormon's.
Fact 4: As for me in my house, we will serve the Lord, not our own wants and needs, sometimes hard to do.