Reader comments
Will signing abuse papers come back to haunt FLDS?
65 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- View live stream of services for...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
93 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19







So, by not signing the document, they can continue to abuse the children.
A. A child is at risk of abuse and or neglect as determined by DFPS;
B. A child has been removed from his/her home and placed in DFPS care or
C. A child formerly in DFPS care is in danger of being returned to DFPS care.
>>> actually it says one of the following. A B C. etc. I see no admission of anything by signing this acknowledgement formm.
The people are doing something to get their children back
This admission is a dirty trick of the State
Please.
I'm not condoning abuse in any form at all. I'm not FLDS. But I think Texas and Judge walther has over played it's hand. I hope they get their heads handed to them on a silver platter by the Texas SC.
What can be done in the name of religion has to be curtailed somewhere. Somewhere before what these people do is acceptable.
Yes, proceed with real allegations of abuse on a case-by-case basis but taking a child from a non-abusive parent is even greater abuse by the government and its agencies (CPS, courts, etc.) Someone needs to be monitoring the added abuse and mental trauma, as well as expenses, this mess is costing. Somehow government agencies are protected and allowed to break laws others are expected to abide by. People are guilty until proven innocent (and this has involved hundreds; not just one or two). I am embarrassed about this whole mess but I am a vocal and active opponent to abuse of women and children by violent, threatening or controlling partners, whatever religion. Running over rights is not helping.
Where is your condemnation of "sexual prison" in places like this?
Obviously, you and too many other people (including the CPS) all consider this the "norm;" a bunch of white folks right out of 'Little House On The Prairie" seems weird to you and Must Be PUNISHED.
PS, I am an Atheistic Jew from New York City and a bona-fide "Red Diaper Doper Baby;" this whole FLDS case just smacks of McCarthyism; it's just another witchunt.
Who really believes that the summary taking of a whole community's children into custody without due process on a child-by-child, case-by-case basis will be upheld by the Supreme court as a 'lawful' and acceptable to the court action?
Texas has created a legal morass for itself on this one, not too dissimilar to how the Bush administration has dealt with this nation's economy, etc.
Remember, every village has its idiot, and there's a village in Texas that's been missing its village idiot for the past seven years.