Reader comments
Energy bill offers consumers relief at pump
17 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- John Florez: The changing face of...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
51 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letters: Rights of conscience
23 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







Remember, even Bush himself said that we need to break our addiction to oil. Too bad the oilman doesn't seem to believe it.
Toyota, GM, Nissan, and other car companies have announced plug-in hybrid and electric cars to be released in 2010. America's energy solution centers on making electricity the substitute for oil -- at current prices, electricity is only 1/4 the price of gasoline for the same amount of power. Wind power is the fastest growing energy source in the world -- America is tapping increasing amounts of wind, including in Utah's Spanish Fork Canyon. That is how Dave will get a windmill into his car -- if not necessarily in his gas tank!
Who says we have to stay with the ancient technology of gas-driven cars?
People tend to forget that there are a lot of very necessary energy consuming activities that we depend on other than driving around in our cars.
Some examples:
Food production, transportation, and refrigerated storage; water treatment and distribution, sewage systems and garbage collection; heating, cooling, and lighting, hospitals and schools, mail delivery, etc.
When the time comes that we need to make hard choices of how to spend our declining energy supplies, which of these will we give up so everyone can keep driving?
Electricity is not a source of power. It is the result of using some other form of power, to create it.
When electric is used to power our cars, say goodbye to being able to afford it. It may be 10 cents a KwH now, but once everyone wants more and more of it, have you not learned the lesson from crude? The price will go through the roof, and so will the cost of lighting our house, using your computer, running the motor in your furnace, etc.
Stop spreading bogus solutions to a problem that doesn't really exist. There is enough oil and shale resource in the US to get us out of this problem, and how people figure that would take ten years is just an example of how gullible they are.
We can't drill in ANWR because its "pristine" and according to Ted Kennedy, we can't have wind farms because it ruins his view of the bay. We are shutting down coal plants, refuse nuclear, and you are going around saying we can use electricity to power our vehicles and run our businesses? LOL!!! Get serious.
I hope you don't actually believe that...
Our water's filthy enough that we carefully limit how much fish we eat...
And just because something is naturally occurring, doesn't mean that it's naturally occurring at the levels we see now.
Those who advocate using more and more oil are living in the 19th or early 20th centuries. It's time to move into the 21st.
Nuclear, wind, solar are solutions to our problems. Hopefully once oilmen get out of the whitehouse we'll pursue other solutions with a bit more vigor.
And where are you going to get the electricity... from burning oil... or coal?
"Wind power is the fastest growing energy source in the world --"
Yes, and at its peak, it will produce about 1 percent of our needs.
"That is how Dave will get a windmill into his car -- if not necessarily in his gas tank!"
That should work for Dave... provided it's downhill all the way to work and back.
Solving the problem of where to get more electricity is far easier than solving the problem of where to get more oil.
The death of the oil business - coming soon to a theater near you!
We also need to exploit nuclear energy as many enlightened countries around the world are doing. By transferring current heating oil and natural gas demands to nuclear it would have the effect of lengthening the time period we have to find "real" long term energy solutions.
The current "green" answers to our energy problems will never supply a significant portion of our energy needs.
I have no doubt that ANWR will be drilled, and fairly soon. It will at best slow the decline of world oil production. It will make a harsh reality slightly less harsh.
I agree with DW that the current "green" answers to our energy problems will never supply a significant portion of our energy "needs". But neither will the remaining economically extractable hydrocarbons. We really need to work on these so called "needs" of ours.
Energy scarcity is unavoidable. Educate yourself about it's dangers. Then take action to reduce your vulnerability to them. There's a lot more to worry about than just whether you can drive.
Like it or not, the economy of the United States is based on Oil and that is not going to change in the near future. Some of her proposals are semi-reasonable but will take years to implement. We need to build Nuclear Power plants, we need to drill for oil off of both coasts and the Gulf of Mexico and yes, ANWAR. We need to drill domestically. We need to develop Tar Sands and Oil Shale. We need to increase refinery capacity and build some new ones. More energy efficient cars would have to be developed and built. All this would require the environazis to get off of the government's back. It would also take time.
The U.S. needs to become energy independent from the Middle East and Venezuala. Cowtowing to the Environazis is not the answer.
Stop name-calling and face reality. Cheap oil is gone, over, done-with. Global demand is too great and production levels are declining.
ANWAR, if drilled completely, represents not more than three years' supply of oil for the U.S. That's irrelevant, however, because once it's drilled its oil will become part of the global market and much of it will end up abroad, not in U.S. refineries. It's a GLOBAL MARKET.
Tar Sands and Oil Shale? Are you kidding? Have you see the estimated costs associated with getting usable quantities of oil from these? Oil from those sources will make $130/barrel look dirt cheap.
Drop the trash-talking attitude and start becoming part of the solution instead of being part of the problem. Live closer to where you work. Drive less. Drive a more fuel-efficient vehicle.