Reader comments
More tough questions for firm that wants to buy iProvo
4 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Is technology making us stupid? DECK:...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
77 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







As if their bungling ways allow them the right to question successful private enterprise.
If I were Broadweave, I'd be tempted to pull the offer - watch iProvo and the city scramble then...
This whole things is so messed up. As was stated in the meeting the other day by the Qwest Rep., "Provo legally, the way Qwest reads it, in the new state statute could be their own provider." That is what should happen - why isn't it?
There's a reason this project should never have been undertaken by a gov't organization. They can't work backwards - private enterprise is NOT subject to the same scrutiny.