Reader comments
Matheson waiting out Demo race
16 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












I think he's supporting Hillary, and doesn't want to tell people because he;d admit to going against 2/3 of Dem voters in his district.
If you can't make a decision you shouldn't have run for the position.
Matheson is calculating. Its what he does best; measures every word and action in his head fifty times before he makes a move.
On the one hand, he thinks he can avoid alienating Clinton and Obama supporters/detractors by not taking a stand, assuming the race is decided before the convention.
ON the other hand, if it goes to convention and if superdelegates become the deciding vote, then he hopes to start a bidding war for his vote; see how much power he can leverage his vote for between the two candidates.
Do you see his dilemma?
Classic Matheson - scared of his own shadow.
Continue being the super delegate you're supposed to be.
Don't cave into popular politics or opinions, but maintain the independence that super delegates were intended to possess and be.
A super delegate bases their vote not on the popular or pledge vote but on the greater picture of the electability of a candidate by the overall voting population of the country and who would most likely carry the electoral vote, regardless is someone else actually carried more of a party's popular/pledge vote.
It does no good for a super delegate to support someone who may have the most popular/pledge votes when they may not carry the general election electoral vote... which is what the super delegate is actually most concerned about (or should be) after all is said and done.
Matheson, you just stay where you are and then cast that vote for the one you believe would be most likely to carry the majority of electoral votes in the November general election.
That what super delegates are about, like it or not!
Translation: Don't support the candidate that the majority of the sheeple in the Democratic party support, vote for Hillary.
This isn't about leverage. It's about the political reality that neither Clinton nor Obama is an asset to the majority of his district. He'd rather stay quiet and let the storm blow over, never revealing his true self.
Vote for Ron Paul!
HaHaHaHaHaHahaHa
that's it; vote for Ron Paul!
HaHaHaHaHaHahaHa