Reader comments
Supreme Court considers whether Internet chat alone can be a crime
22 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
72 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







The difference would be that the man propositioned an actual under-age girl, and was not a victim of police entrapment. Morally, police do not have any right to trap someone into any illegal activity they would not have been committing otherwise.
Your rational is like saying that it's wrong for undercover cops to set up a buy for drugs to catch a dealer.
What we actually need is a more proactive technological approach to this growing problem. Start with parents watching more closely what their children are doing on the internet.
Next, make laws requiring companies that feature internet chat for minors provide a quick abuse link that can be clicked alerting a moderator and saving a complete chat log that includes the IP address of the potential abuser. When a pattern of abuse comes from a certain IP a profile of that individual and what they are after should be apparent. That is when a sting should be set up, with plenty of evidence, clear intent and hopefully an increased prison sentence because there wouldn't be any doubt that the person was using electronics means to ensnare minors.
It should only take the same IP address coming up two or three times before a pattern is evident. I just hope that the authorities do these stings in a way that none of the people caught could use the entrapment defense as they very well could now.
The man never saw a 13 year old girl and did nothing
The other end was a setup
This is illegal to start with
The cyber cop said she was 13 and inticed the man
It does remain a problem
The cyber cop needs a year in jail as well
If it wasn't an Task Force agent then it would have been a crime but it was a Task Force agent and the man may have acted inappropriately but he didn't have sex with a minor or follow through on his internet chat.
We must bear in mind that the Task Force agent was also culpable and played a major part in getting this man to cross the line between having an online chat to talking about sex with a minor and then setting up a meeting with them. What would have happened had the man not shown up that time but had instead chosen not to do so because he still had some boundaries he wouldn't cross but later went online and started a conversation with a real minor but the agent had broken down the barriers. That agent would be responsible for a child being molested.
I agree that the Agents actions were reprehensible and could have resulted in an online chat turning into something far more serious. Had this man said no this time and not acted upon anything he would be far more likely to do so the next time because of the actions of the Agent. Look at what the agent was able to accomplish. She got him to drive to the school and almost met with her. What would have happened had he driven half-way but decided to turn around. He wouldn't have committed a crime but now he is one step closer to doing so because of the agent's actions.
So I agree that the agent needs to be held culpable since this type of behavior could lead to someone saying no this time but end up saying yes when it is my or your child. Shame on the agent!