Reader comments
LDS teens injured in Arizona attack
83 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
57 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







Personally I don't support the concept of "hate crime" since the action is what is criminal not the motive. To treat it otherwise is to advocate thought police. Whether the kids committed assault because they were LDS, or because they were wearing Lakers tee shirts, doesn't really matter. The crime was assault.
Having said that; this is probably fallout from the unabashed religious bigotry that was openly displayed, and not repudiated, during the Romney candidacy. The same bigotry was then further exercised in the YFZ Ranch raid. Yes, they are two completely separate religions. The trouble is bigots don�t tend to be very quick on the uptake regarding differences in the objects of their bigotry.
Being a bigot shouldn�t be criminal; doing something illegal based on your bigotry is criminal.
You are so right. Punish actions not thoughts or beliefs.
Hate Crime laws are silly and make dangerous precedents.
Sometimes the motive is the ONLY difference between a crime and an innocent act.
I fear that condemning sin is labeled as a hate crime sometimes or could be soon. If I condemn something, I am in no way encouraging any criminal behavior. Nor am I telling someone else that they should harm someone who is committing the sin. I am saying something is wrong and shouldn't be facing prosecution for that.
Pre-meditated murder
Manslaughter
Homicide
Killing an unborn child (viable not yet born)
Self-defense
Vehicular homicide
ALL of these crimes are judged and sentenced based on intent (for those who are slower... the THOUHGT that happens before and/or during the act of ending a life).
The intent of assault can be a defense if the thoughts are the �right� ones.
I would suggest you think before you speak/type but then you would be held to a higher degree of responsibility for what you say/write.
Everyone deserves protection under the law regardless if you skin is a different color, your religion is not main stream, or your belief systems are skewed.
As for "just wondering..." we should care what other people do. Our society is built on ideas that need to be voiced and challenged, just not with fists.
And sometimes the intent, makes the action not a crime at all.
Occassionally, people are actually killed by someone who is just trying to help them.
It's all about being politically correct these days.