Reader comments
Demo aims to unseat Orton as national committeeman
25 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
101 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












McCoy is the worst kind of politician. I think that Orton should be commended for sticking by his friend despite his political leaning. I wouldn't want a national committee rep who would stab a friend in the back just because he belonged to a different party.
McCoy, get over it. And ideally, take it back to your home state where these sorts of hardball tactics may be more welcome.
When Democrats do it...well at least the Deseret News covered the story. Normally it would be the crickets chirping thing. Still, should we expect an editorial calling the Democrats names?
1) I am not a hypocrite. I have not and will not endorse a Republican in a partisan race.
2) I am not upset that someone would challenge me. That is what our democratic process is about. I will stand by my record and my representation of my district . Any Democrat or Republican is free to challenge me and I will argue that I am the best person for the job.
3) It is interesting that you accuse me of being upset "that someone would dare challenge" me and then say that I went against Paula's wishes in opposing her husband to take over the seat. I mean how dare I challenge her right? Isn't that what you are saying. You need to remember that seats are not hand-me-downs and are not inherited. They come open and a democratic process elects the candidates and ultimately the officeholders. That seat was not Puala's it was the people of the Second Districts. It was not hers to bequeath.
4) Thanks for the advice but I am "over it." All I did was send out some information that people can take or leave about this elected position. I didn't seek out the press on this, they came to me. So, the delegates can use the info or disregard it. It is up to them. I am not using "hardball" tactics. Since when is sending an email and sharing information a hardball tactic?
Way to go Joe, you're a real help to Utah Democrats.
I just don't recall making that statement. I certainly don't deny endorsing Brian. I'm not trying to hide anything here.
1) Sen McCoy is an outstanding Senator. Because the Dems are so outnumbered, his ideas rarely make it through to the Governor. But McCoy is the best Senator SLC has right now. Watching him in Committee, he really is the one who "gets it" among his other colleagues. He's the only one, IMO, who isn't over his head among the Senate Dems. He, not Pat Jones or Gene Davis, should be the Senate Minority Leader.
2) Brian Doughty has been a Log Cabin Republican, but that doesn't matter, because McCoy's endoresment was not in a partisan race.
3) If you hold a party office, you are expected to endorse party candidates. Orton failed on this measure. He is welcome to endorse whomever he wishes, just not as National Committeeman.
This situation is pretty cut and dry. McCoy has Orton dead to rights on this one.
To be fair, there is a difference between voting for someone and actively campainging for them.
Not being registered in any party, I say let the democrats handle it internally by their rules and procedures. That doesn't mean we can't watch with amusement or consternation or concern from the sidelines.
This is not about revenge. When I look at this I ask myself who is going to do the best job as National Committeeman. That job is to support an build the Democratic party both locally and nationally. How would increasing the Republican super-majority in the state Legislature by supporting my Republican opponent help accomplish the mission and job of the Democratic National Committeeman or the state party. I am not saying that Bill Orton cannot vote for or support anyone he desires. Rather, if he is to be our Democratic National Committeeman he shouldn't endorse Republican candidates over our Democratic candidates. The Republican that Bill endorsed is running against our Democratic incumbent in the District 24 in the Avenues now. Bill shouldn't endorse him over her either. This is not about me. It is about the principle and the position that Bill holds and seeks to continue to hold.
I have never demanded any kind of lock-step voting with the party. Who a person votes for in the privacy of their voting booth is their own business and I understand that there are many people who vote for the person and not the party. I am sure I have many republicans in my district that have voted for me as a person rather than their party's candidate. That is fine. What cannot be forgotten in this case is that Orton was elected to a partisan leadership position in the Democratic Party. As such, he is expected and required to discharge that office in favor of Democratic candidates. If Bill wanted to endorse or support or vote for the Republican in my race as plain old former congressman Bill Orton, then so be it. The difference is that he was the Democratic National Committeeman at the time. As such, he was bound by a different set of rules and considerations at that time and in that position. Again, this isn't about me. I overwhelmingly won my race. This is about the position and who we want in it.
Selective memory I guess.