Reader comments
Warming could push Colorado to historic low
87 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- New president of the Maldives expands...
- At Doo.Ri, a focus on the complete woman
- Venezuela's opposition chooses...
- Peru: Leftist rebel leader found...
- Foos win 4 at Grammys, overshadowed...
- A mix of leather, mesh, and African...
- Death of Whitney Houston leaves...
- Greece passes new austerity deal amid...
- 'The Artist' named best picture at UK...
- Carnival goes to the dogs with Rio...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Romney adds to delegate lead with...
- View live stream of services for...
- White House didn't foresee birth...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney may be in danger in Michigan...
- Romney edges Santorum in...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
In News
Across Site
- Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Gay rights and religious liberty
79 - Santorum sweeps caucuses
48 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Romney in trouble in Mich., beyond?
25 - Obama attempts to calm the waters
23 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18 - Maine: Romney wins caucuses
17 - GOP electorate still holding out
17







The writers should research the other side of the question before regurgitating the standard "consensus" line. But that would be too hard and require work I guess.
Could it be that we simply don't have enough data to say anything about global warming?
Pick a fight with their data or techniques, cite a reliable conflicting opinion we can go to, but don't trot out your ignorance of the U.S. Geological Service, one of the most respected scientific agencies around.
I have known/worked with the USGS off and on for decades. The agency is filled with neutral and well trained scientists who just love to crunch numbers, run models, and let the conclusions be based on science, the systematic verifiable body of knowledge.
The Colorado is overwhelmed by us. Of that there is no doubt, unless you are biased toward the view that man can only do great things and that some how we are supposed to procreate more and more and hope that something good happens to our limited water supply.
These problems of over population and limited water are so well-known that it is suprising to see that there are folks left who are still in denial. Amazing relics.
As to global warming, the scientists with no cross to burn, point at us, we, you and I, as adding to the problem. Not the sole cause, but definitely a significant factor in the change.
Go back and run the tape again of what Gore said. He told it truthfully.
My campus applauded his effort. Reasonably so.
The Shadown Knows.
Their prophets have been wrong two years running. This is simply a religious scam that is being crammed down our throats.
We should all be thankful for global warming because we don't have to listen to the press go on and on any more about the hole in the ozone layer!
In like sense global warming will only be "solved" when the media comes up with their next scary story that they can fall back on when there is no real news!
I love it when the arrogance of man THINKS they can actually change the climate..... the earth has been through how many coolings and warmings over the thousands of years? Was man responsible for the Ice Age or for when it ended?
You are not in charge my friend. Their is only One in charge of this earth and its existence....and as far as I know, you ain't Him.