Reader comments
Attorneys, media, others descend on San Angelo for FLDS custody hearing
51 comments | Read story
The article said that "Sarah" doesn't exist.
*hold your fire*
The article ALSO said that the phone call was not the reason for the removals. It CLEARLY stated that the removals were based on what the Texas authorities saw upon arriving at the compound, not the phone call.
I have determined that someone must have known about the abuse in the compound (duh). He or she would have wanted to help the people, and decided the best way to alert the authorities was to pretend to be one of the abused people (I disagree).
OR . . .
It's also probable that someone from inside the compound called to report the abuse, but posed as someone else in order to avoid community disgrace. Once the police where there, they knew, the investigation would roll by itself.
Remember:
The removals were not made because of the call. They were made because of *concrete* evidence found once inside the compound.
And if your probable cause is a big fat lie, as it is in this case, any charges resulting from it are likely to be dropped. Not at this local-yokel level, where the same judge who took the kids gets to rule on whether it was proper to take the kids. But at the federal level, which is where this will end up.
This is exactly the problem. The call appears to be a fabrication. Without the call being valid, without the victim being found, without the named defendant being part of the case, it matters not what evidence was gathered within the compound.
CPS officials are now trying to justify their illegal actions by pointing out these illegal actions were approved by a judge. Illegal actions are illegal actions, regardless of if they are perpetrated by 50 year old men and sanctioned by their church leaders or perpetrated by CPS officers and sanctioned by a small-town judge.
Thank goodness for the concept of judicial review. At some point this whole case will get reviewed by a responsible judge who cares about the legal foundation of this country and then what? Odds are that at that time, hundreds of teenage female victims will be sent back to their "spiritual husbands".
This whole situation is a tragedy. A tragedy made worse by the failure CPS officials to get a proper search warrant.
Are you hoping the charges will be dropped? If theres a kid thats 13 and shes been impregnated by some 60 yr old man, while her mother sits back and condones it, are you going to sit there and hope all charges will be dropped?
I hope they nail em to a wall. Texas is doing the best they can to see that justice is carried out acccording to the law. This isnt about just the girl that called in, its about child molestation and sexual perversion.
To "No":
Remember:
The call is practically irrelevent right now. The removals and drastic action were made because, once in the compound, the police found abuse. They were NOT relying on evidence from the phone call. I frankly don't care where the call came from.
Now . . .
If the call had been faked, and the police had run into the compound and pulled everyone out just because of a call they couldn't prove, that would be a crime. If the women and children had been removed because of the call and not the *concrete* evidence, then then police would have something to be ashamed about.
But, as we all know, the removals were made because of PHYSICAL evidence PHYISICALLY seen by the authorities.
Any questions?
Do not get me wrong. Anyone abusing children should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Marry girls off under 18 years off is, in my view, child abuse.
I will be holding everyone involved in this event in the Light of Christ.
-a catholic
All of you who think that Texas is wrong should consider the 15 year old girls that are being raped and impregnated by 50+ year old men and the 12-14 year old boys that are being dropped off on street corners and banished.
Their entire belief system involves "advancement" in the spiritual hereafter depending on the the level or number of children produced and brought into the "fold". As absurd as outsiders find it, those BELIEVING it are trying to "advance" to a higher "kingdom"! The female roll is to obey or go to hell! This sick belief system (which ALSO teaches that the women are DEPENDANT on their "man" to "take" them to heaven) should be understood before all these comments confuse things further........
Consider the recent claims:
* FLDS leaders marrying off underage women to older men.
* Young, underage brides being raped.
* These improper marriages being consummated in their temple in Texas.
* Teenage boys being driven from the faith to provide more marriage opportunities for older men.
* A denial of education.
* Constant instruction that failure to follow their leaders and their latest whims will lead to eternal damnation.
* Physical abuse.
* Leaders who have been convicted of aiding and abetting rape.
* A secretive, suspicion and manipulative culture.
I've spent some time among the Amish. Similar to the FLDS, they retreat from modern society. But, they are friendly and open when interacting to the outside world.
In contrast, the FLDS are just bizarre. The press activities by the wives yesterday was just unnerving. Robotic. Fearful. Very, very strange.
These folks have more in common with the Branch Davidians or Jim Jones' folks in Central America than early Mormon pioneers. This may be the case where harsh government action is justified.
I don't hear these pitiful women crying over those children removed from their lives by FLDS leadership. A mother's heart is not that cold, is it?
Anybody noticed this irony?
Why beg to have back the children when you have already condemned and expelled other precious children all in the name of old men needing more wives? I think you don't really care about your children that much by example of years of throwing your children to the proverbial wolves. The government's the least of your problems. Your convictions are warped.
If the FLDS really valued their children, we wouldn't hear about the "Lost Boys" and these other sad cases of children who have grown up to be successful in fleeing this cult.
We're all paying for this "lifestyle."
As far as them never being able to live in a normal life..... That's rediculous. Everyone wants to be loved, they will understand basic rights to all.
I have a question for you but first let's recall a bit of history.
The FLDS group has been raided at least 4 times in the past based upon the exact same allegations, (i.e. child sexual abuse) and each time ALL allegations were PROVEN FALSE, the FLDS were exonerated and children subsequently returned.
The FLDS group is and has been under constant surveillance and scrutiny by numerous government agencies for many DECADES. All that time those agencies have been looking very carefully for ANY wrongdoing of the group and yet they have found NONE.
And now the question.
What part of your argument accounts for the statistically significant wrongdoing and violation of the 4th amendment of the US Constitution by the state of Texas and it's subsequent government agencies?
On a side note I thought the statement "Don't mess with the children of Texas," was very revealing. They honestly believe that the children are the property of the state of Texas and are behaving as such. What an eye opener.
Lane Meyer
The removal came because of what the authorities found. Sarah is just the trigger and does not have to appear in person. Read the court papers people, stop making things up. It's an abuse investigation.
The practice by the FLDS of stone-walling and lying is making it all the worse. Watch the interviews, ever see people change the subject multiple times?
Since the FLDS, wouldn't identify whose child was whose, this is going to go on for too long. They brought the problems on themselves. DNA will have to be used to determine who is biological mother and who is biological father. Should be interesting.
"We're all paying for this "lifestyle." "
Thats true. We are also paying for the lifestyle of welfare moms all over the country. The difference is that these people have a dad (perhaps not a great one...who knows).
Surely, the cost is not an issue, but tax dollars will be severely overburdened if every suspected abuse case is by law, forced to react to every real and remote report of abuse in this manner. I doubt if there exists enough foster homes in America to handle all the potential abuse. Institutionalizing abused children will be the next logical approach.
Will Texas choose to look the other way in the case of non-polygamous under age pregnant girls or are they willing to treat everyone the same?
This was not a crime.
This was legal.
The kids were removed base on *concrete* evidence.
Let's pretend . . . you're 14. You have been married to a 53yo man. Now you're 5 weeks pregnant. You are his 3rd wife, and he is the only husband you will ever have. He abused you yesterday, and you can barely move without pain. You will never know any other life. You are shouting thanks to CPS, and you can't eat for fear of being sent back to YFZ.
snickerdoodle would not want to live like that. Neither would you.
The call was "fabricated and it matters not what evidence was found in the compound" ????
Once the investigation starts they can turn over every stone if they feel they need to. It would be no different then a child inadvertantly called 911 and the cops showed up at your front door to respond and while you are explaining that the call was an accident they see something illegal in your house while standing at the door talking to you,they are going to come on in.
This was legal.
This was based on abuse found in the community.
The authorities went in and did not find *Sarah* -- but they did find abuse.
Sounds like an investigation to me. I can just imagine one of the FLDS geezers saying-
"last thing we need is an investigation . . ."
"Escape" by Carolyn Jessop.
I listened to part of a recording of it. That left no doubt in my mind of the sexual abuse in that community.
Now are you going to try and deny Carolyn Jessop? Is she now a fake?
If polygamy isn't abuse, then I don't know what is.
It said in the article that "they found abuse". I think that's pretty simple. They found abuse. Period. Look for those precise words in the article. (it's in one of these FLDS articles somewhere)
If you can use the article to defend you thinking, why can't I?
Send 2 children to each of the 258 counties in the state. That should calm things down.
SUBCHAPTER B PROVISIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR REPORTING SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE
� 6311. Persons required to report suspected child abuse.
� 6312. Persons permitted to report suspected child abuse.
� 6313. Reporting procedure.
� 6314. Photographs, medical tests and X-rays of child subject to report.
� 6315. Taking child into protective custody.
� 6316. Admission to private and public hospitals.
� 6317. Mandatory reporting and postmortem investigation of deaths.
� 6318. Immunity from liability.
� 6319. Penalties for failure to report.
In the FLDS situation, there was a call (� 6312-6313). If the call was faked, then they (CPS) may not have known. That call authorized the investigation of the compound. Once the authorities were in the compound (a little too heavily armored), they found abuse and removed the children (� 6315). As for photographs, medical tests and X-rays of child subject to report (� 6314), I have no idea if they did that.
snickerdoodle awaits your comments.
yhey reported this and she wrote an order to pick up all the children
2no one was arested so no maranda needed
the officers and courts are trying to settle a very unuseal case they need are help not our anger
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Live nativity in New Hampshire 12:35 p.m.
- Herbert wants uranium delayed 12:29 p.m.
- LDS youths organize book drive 12:15 p.m.
- Tethering pets could become crime 12:00 p.m.
- Powell skips police interview 11:48 a.m.
- Texas rests in polygamy trial 11:46 a.m.
- Man dies when car goes into river 11:41 a.m.
- China royal visit riles Japan 11:27 a.m.
- Oil rebounds after 9-day drop 11:26 a.m.
- Stocks mixed after inflation data 11:23 a.m.
- Cougar seniors see a new Bronco
- Sources: Josh Powell hires attorney
- Cougs brace for coaching changes
- Wet spot found in Powell's home
- Cougars O-line a strength
- Fun games to enliven holiday parties
- Bleak holiday for Powell's boys
- Storms dumped lots of snow in Utah
- Jazz stunned by Timberwolves
- Man lives in Moab cave
- LDS to emphasize helping needy
127 - Unga might enter NFL draft
107 - BYU to wear royal blue uniforms
104 - TV mom gives birth to 19th child
101 - Disappearance called 'suspicious'
97 - Sources: Josh Powell hires attorney
96 - Jazz stunned by Timberwolves
96 - Stay the course with our president
87 - Choir, guests unwrap musical magic
85 - Barkley says Boozer is big problem
81
David Rankin, one of Utah's youngest and ablest astrophotographers has...
There was a time when free shipping was rare. This holiday season, you...
First of all, to "20/20," how can you read newspapers and not understand...
Obama's bringing his terrorist buddies from Guantanamo to Illinois to use as...
I think it's obvious that the GOP owes Palin... not the other way around....
These polls are perfect news bites. Throw something out there each week that...
I hope this guy is innocent because I am jumping to conclusion like so many...
Since anybody and everybody can beat the New Mexico, Wyoming, Colorado State,...
Great letter. Thanks, Brad.
Progressives in general are not good (Anymore). I think the "Emperor" should...
They actually lost a child on contraception. Seems not doing that anymore is...
Utahns love Hatch and Bennett? Why not. They're white male Mormons.
It's a good idea before deciding on a drive to benefit a hospital to check...



