Reader comments
My view: Same-state sponsors are best for bills

7 comments   |   Read story

Timj | 6:34 a.m. April 14, 2008
The Legacy Highway lawsuit cost how much?
Had the road been in an appropriate location in the first place, no lawsuit would've been raised. Had lawmakers been willing to compromise with those "evil environmentalists" the lawsuit would not have dragged on so long and Utah taxpayers would've saved a ton of money. One of the first things Huntsman did when elected governor was to compromise and get construction on the highway going again.
It's sad that some people hate the environment and its support groups so much that they refuse to ever have a civil discussion with them. Fortunately, Huntsman was willing to do the intelligent thing, compromise, stop the lawsuit, and save taxpayers loads of money.
BBKing | 6:41 a.m. April 14, 2008
One thing about Jim Hansen is that he is full of great stories! And his institutional knowledge is something that cannot be overstated.

That aside, another restriction in Washington DC may not be the proper answer. Washington DC, Congress, is already one of the most restricted (read: dominated by 'good old boy' rules) environments you can come up.

Right now, rules with great arguments like this, make it almost impossible for anyone but committee chairs to run legislation. Anything of meaning to Americans like tax reform, immigration reform, etc functionally require a committee chair to do it, or nothing. Seniority was an argument like this one and it is ruining America.

Let our legislators go free! Remove all of these good old boy rules and laws and let the chips fly where they may. If some knucklehead out of New York runs the bill, fine. Then allow open debate with all votes recorded. Allow for the very rules that all 50 states use, much more freedom friendly then the crud and control that Congress has in place.

Congress is owned and controlled by about 20 Congresmmen, who are in-turn owned by special interest.

Not another control law Jim, PLEASE!
steve | 7:46 a.m. April 14, 2008
Having members of your state put forth land bills is all well and good. When all of your folks in Congress are beholden to devolopers and energy intrests ( including the author Jim Hansen),anybody with the ability to look forward more than on generation is more than welcome to sponsor land bills!
Comments continue below
Reason | 4:10 p.m. April 14, 2008
Re: Jim Hansen: Good article. I agree with your view, and have long respected your work in Congress. Local control and local sponsorship is an important issue.
BBKing | 10:51 p.m. April 14, 2008
Jim is up in the night and I am shocked at the support for this! So we want a better energy policy but since none of us live in Alaska, no one can run a bill to open up the oil fields up there?

Some people can't think further than the end of their nose. And Jim Hansen is the ULTIMATE in good old boy! Nice guy but holy cow...more to life than seniority.

And you people buy it! Amazing!
Anonymous | 10:24 a.m. April 15, 2008
Great article Jim. Hinchey should not be pushing this through.
Fifth Gen. Utahn | 11:05 a.m. April 15, 2008
Oh Jim, your memory is so short, and your recall of the facts so selective. You're so desperate to muddy the waters that you can't even keep the issues straight. Congressional Wilderness designation has NOTHING to do with the Legacy Highway or draining Lake Powell.
America's Redrock Wilderness Act was introduced by Wayne Owens, D, UT., not Maurice Hinchey. Hinchey carried the bill after Owens left the house - NOT because environmentalists "shopped" Congress, but because of the close friendship shared by Maurice and Wayne stemming from matters of Middle East peace.
Your memory fails on the battles over wilderness in the mid-nineties as well - your bill proposed 1.8 million acres of BLM wilderness, not 4.2. Babbitt found 5.8 million acres, not 5.7, and that effort was a direct result of you challenging him to do so. Instead of admitting your bill was not based on broad public support, good science and actual on the ground conditions, you accuse Babbitt's inventory of being "poorly done." That's just not true, Jim.
Finally, Utah's public lands are owned equally by all Americans that's why Utah Wilderness is a national Issue, and will continue to be.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Tavernari has matured

At least that guy you tore down thinks realistically. As Shoot It says, the...

Wyoming writer amazed by BYU

The only reason the Oklahoma game has lost it's luster is because we...

Let's see. The Deseret News is an LDS owned newspaper sold in a state that...

Why should I be forced to pay for any abortion?

Cougars practice with urgency

To me he is the symbol of a BIG DISAPOINTING season. What might have been if...

I have been a care giver most of my life and there have been hard times, but...

Sloan may toy with starting lineup

Come on, you can't really believe Slosn has the final say on who stays and...

I demand YOU pay my way in life and if you complain, I will call you greedy...

I like Max... not perfect, but a hard core competitor, which is all you can...

Whether or not all his theories prove to be true, this guy opened my eyes to...

Advertisements
Advertisement