Reader comments
S.L. Council OKs City Creek skybridge in a 6-1 vote
36 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
83 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







Patrons aren't forced to take the Skybridge to the other side of City Creek. Those at ground level can take the crosswalk right there, or just spill out onto Main Street and shop there, or go up and across. The walkthru made it feel to me that this project ties a large portion of the downtown area together into a modern, clean, and open business, retail and residential whole. It will have its naysayers, of course, but I think the overall effect will be very positive to downtown SLC. You'll see.
Build more skybridges. This is not a new or unique downtown addition. For years cities like Seattle, San Diego, Portland, Vancouver, Spokane and many others have proven the safety, convenience and architectural beauty of skybridges. People of SLC, why all the fuss? There has been more money spent in debate and regulation than this thing will cost. This downtown development, the entire project, will unquestionably be a first class improvement to the City and the region. Detractors offer nothing in response ... only added cost and contention. Let's get the project completed so we all can enjoy it!
Part of having a "green" city is having skybridges.
Pedestrians crossing streets require crosswalks. Crosswalks add stoplight rotations. In the case of downtown, many of those pedestrian stoplight rotations happen automatically. That forces cars (the ones who pollute) to sit there & idle while a few people (or in some cases, no people) cross the street.
By putting in skybridges, you eliminate pedestrians needing to cross the street. Therefore you can eliminate stoplight rotations, drivers are stopped less time. That means less traffic congestion and less idling......which means less pollution and wasted gas.
If you can't grasp that I think I might be dealing with a lost cause.
The perils of a theocracy!
I don't know the religious preferences of all of the City Council, but my guess is that not all are practicing Mormons and some voted for the skybridge and City Creek Project because in their esitmation it will be good for SLC.
There has been substantial criticism of the church for the City Creek project. To the critics I ask: would you have preferred the virtually dead ZCMI and Crossroads Malls to have remained shuttered and empty? How does that help vitalize downtown or mainstreet?
What is this guy smoking? Does he think that tiny little mom-and-pop operations are the answer to revitalizing downtown SLC? Or is he really just hiding a hidden agenda?
I don't know the merits or the de-merits of the proposed skybridge. But I do know that Rocky Anderson is opposed to it. Therefore, I support it.
Not 6 people making the decision
The Council is out of order voteing for the people
This is Un Constitutional
The Constitution provides for a representative government of elected officials. The Council members were elected by the people for the express purpose of making such decisions.
It's ok. Maybe they didn't teach that in your grade school.