Reader comments
Inspectors warned Hill AFB

Not inspectors | 9:04 a.m. April 6, 2008

The Air Force Audit Agency has Auditors - not Inspectors. There is a difference.

leroy | 9:07 a.m. April 6, 2008

The guilty party will be the lowest ranking civilian or military. Guaranteed. No one with authority will take the rap.

suzyk | 1:19 p.m. April 6, 2008

Hill Air Force Base like other governmental run agencies have employees that do not do their job as paid. There is a high rate of waste of material, time and this problem does not surprise me. I hope the guilty will be found and not push down on a honest worker who is reliable and does his job. Upper Echalon are famous for not taking the rap when they are responsible...they are cowards in my opinion and I worked with some of those at Hill AFB>

Comments continue below

Anonymous | 3:27 p.m. April 6, 2008

"The guilty party will be the lowest ranking civilian or military. Guaranteed. No one with authority will take the rap."

Hit that right on the head- can't argue with it at all. I know some of the guys at EG&G worked at a DC in Freeport center. That is the rule of thumb- blame someone else when something goes wrong-AND- Take credit for things you didn't do.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.