Reader comments
MormonTimes.com: Readers weigh in on favorite LDS fiction writers
17 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Faith
Across Site
- New president of the Maldives expands...
- Top Republican wants vote on birth...
- 'I Believe' license plates available...
- Fire destroys barn storing items...
- Army officer wants humanism...
- Will Islam embrace pluralism?
- Book review: 'Double Deceit' is the...
- Helping others avoid and overcome...
- Conservatives shrug at Obama birth...
- As Syria burns, neighboring Lebanon...
In Faith
Across Site
- 'Why I'm a Mormon': Steve Young
- Vai's View: Vai's View: The power of...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Ties that bind? How interfaith...
- The Restoration stands up to history
- Tips for making empty-nesters years...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Linda & Richard Eyre: Helping others...
- Steve Eaton: Home alone experience...
- Helping others avoid and overcome...
In Faith
Across Site
- Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - 'Why I'm a Mormon': Steve Young
29 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - The Restoration stands up to history
19 - Vai's View: The power of parenting
12 - Hatch says Obama violated freedom
12 - Temples are sacred, not secret
8







Lund is a much better author.
As for the rest, well, most simply aren't worth reading.
They "naturally" deal with struggles between good and evil because
1) their faith makes them simple-minded, black-and-white thinkers; and
2) they honestly think they have some privileged moral position with superior insights into morality than anyone else.
But for my money, LDS fiction in general is NOT a good spend, especially Lund's historical fiction nonsense that does such a POOR job of character development.
Try Brady Udall--definitely not a one-trick pony. Read his excellent short story collection, "Letting Loose the Hounds" (Norton, 1997) or better yet, his wonderful (first) novel, "The Miracle Life of Edgar Mint" (Norton, 2001).
I would also like to mention one of my favorites who should be on the list, but isn't: Robert Marcum. Great books.
Speaking of "one trick ponies", John Grishom - nothing but law stories, ugh; Robin Cook, and Michael Palmer - just medical stories. And they all are just about good and evil. They must be highly over-rated... but I enjoy their books anyway; isn't that what really matters in the end? Get over it, guys.
Those are the top 3 for me anyway.
Gotta give a hand to Stephenie Meyer too for her "Twilight" Series, thats just plain a fun read.
But - when referring to Gerald Lund, the author, I think Dessert News makes a mistake in putting his current title of Elder under his picture or in the article (not related to his works written previously). It would be fair to say something like "Gerald Lund, now a general authority, wrote 'The Work and the Glory' fictional series for LDS audiences which focuses on Pioneer history" But his writings aren't endorsed by the church and his authorship should stand independent of his current role.
One may think of it like when you quote a president of the church who wrote something as an apostle. You refer to their appropriate title at the delivery of their message. "Elder McKay, later sustained as president of the church" at the X general conference preached ..." Yes, the mention of where they end up affects the perception of their role in LDS society but a news organization should be careful in their quotation.
Lund did not write the W&G as a GA.
But his LDS-fiction is another story. In fact, fiction-with-an-LDS-theme does not fare very well at all. The fact the LDS people read it is not evidence that it is good literature of any kind. It only shows the ideosynchratic tastes of the LDS people, which are an anomaly.