Reader comments
U. researches a merger with Dixie College

6 comments   |   Read story

Diversity | 11:11 p.m. March 22, 2008
So much for respecting local culture and diversity. Washington county has been "Utah's Dixie" as long as anyone can remember and Dixie College traces its lineage and name directly back to the original Dixie Academy started by the early LDS settlers. I don't think it has ever had a nickname other than Rebels.

Why are people so upset over a name with a long acceptance and history? St. George was never known for anything to do with slavery or other unpleasantries of the Old South. Let it keep a little culture and history. These academic elites need to get off their high horses and practice a little more of that "tolerance" and "celebrating diversity" they always preach when it is to the benefit of left-wing agendas.
Education is a Left Wing Agenda? | 11:54 p.m. March 22, 2008
It was known as the St. George Academy before it was renamed Dixie Academy, thanks for missing that first point. They were also known as the Flyers before taking on the nickname Rebels.
Anonymous | 8:58 a.m. March 24, 2008
Who cares about the nickname. After all the school is about education..not nicknames. and what would you want on your diploma..Dixie, a school most of the nation has never heard of..or the U that is nationally recognized..
Comments continue below
Leftwinger | 1:47 p.m. March 24, 2008
I'm happy to hear the board still ignores the opinion of St. George residents
Will you write a check Leftwinge | 5:35 p.m. March 24, 2008
So if it is of the opinion of St. George residents that Dixie State College should not enlist the help of the University of Utah to meet the educational needs of one of the fastest growing metro areas of the USA, does that mean that you and all the others ancient St. Georgians who are steadfast in their ways and traditions will write the checks for the $$$$$ necessary to have DSC get there on its own?

Didn't think so.
UUSG | 1:56 p.m. March 27, 2008
News flash to the Deseret Morning News. The "white paper" and other official documents outlining the enhanced affiliation specifically renounce the idea that this affiliation is a "merger".

What kind of impression are you trying to create in the minds of readers? But then again, I am assuming you have botherered to read those documents.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

No, students are NOT safe from predators. If a parent wants to make sure...

If you really think Mormon's are mainstream, you must not have paid attention...

I don't see the schools presidents voting to get rid of WYM or NM, even...

Big games keep UHSAA coffers full

why people complain about how football is covered by the media too much. when...

A little perspective is not a bad thing. Notice the Cougar's won loss record...

I actually was encouraged by some aspects of the game. Any Utah fan who has...

A story about Mormons as minorities? In this paper? Get over the "victim"...

she was an awesome woman someone i looked up to when i was younger she was...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Wow you just made one of the dumbest comments I've heard yet. Fire Bronco????...

Photos: A Royal welcome home

Re: Huh?, You like many other haters are probably oblivious to many obvious...

Advertisements
Advertisement