Reader comments
Judge sides with state over Navajo oil trust

5 comments   |   Read story

John L | 12:06 p.m. March 15, 2008
Interesting. A story about how the Navajos are again victim of their benevolent white brothers (State and Federal Government) and not one comment. Perhaps the DN should do an investigative story on the truth of the plight of the Navajos, from the forced march to modern day. When a people are kept at the courtesy of any government, their hope is gone. We can argue all day long about what the Navajos' role in their current situation has been, but the fact of the matter is the root is the curse of being wards of the State. Give them a break. The plight of the reservation should be a priority to every person in this country.
Sure | 5:15 p.m. March 15, 2008
I would love to give them a break. Lets have them be responsible for their own money, accounting, safety, protection, education, commerce, ect. ect. Then maybe the rest of us wont have to be. The fact is, they have been far too dependent for far too long. If they make their own choices then the "plight" of the reservation will be their own. Right?
To Sure | 6:03 p.m. March 15, 2008
I think we are arguing the same point. Let's get government controls off the reservation and let the Indians have a chance like the rest of us. That includes controlling the land, mineral rights and water rights unfettered. When you treat people like second class citizens who are incapable of making their own decisions, they will prove you right.

John L.
Comments continue below
sure | 10:20 p.m. March 15, 2008
But along with making them responsible they need to quit expecting finacial help. Lets face it,none of the people in the tribe today were alive when the treaties were signed. If they want to be treated like everyone else then they need to make it on their own like everyone else.
Forrest | 11:39 a.m. March 17, 2008
With regard to the comments above, with the exception of the first one, it is not so simple. We are dealing with a culturally different group and their abilities to manage their own resources varies and depends upon some very complex variables. History tells us that turning over responsibility for resources too soon has been a disaster via the Allotment era that began 1887 and the termination era of the 1950s (termination of Utah's Paiutes for example). The key to all this is education and training. As long as there is an achievement gap, it will hamper efforts to promote self determination and keep Indian people dependent upon governments. Regarding Indian people and self-reliance, they were all very self-reliance prior to contact with Euro-Americans.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

What exactly were Nephite interpreters?

I know Mormons constantly say that JS couldn't have written the BOM because...

interesting, BYU owns the point spread (and most other statistics) over...

Utah group finds homes for orphans

Generally I think this is a good thing, but I have 4 problems with it. 1)...

Letters: Liberal rant amusing

Yeah an attack on our country and we are fighting in Iraq. Why? GWB started...

We live in a culture that values women as wives and mothers ideally more than...

awsome story. IT is true that the 'pokes were concerned about pitta that they...

If you want information on politics, the environment or anything else avoid...

Yup, looks like Republicans at it again.. I have learned to go without a...

Utah women lag in higher education

Why is only university considered here? What about post secondary education...

I have a proposal. Since the flat tax, also a Huntsman idea, was...

Advertisements
Advertisement