Deseret News | Reader comments: House permits open carry of loaded guns

Reader comments
House permits open carry of loaded guns

Real Estate Junkie | 1:53 p.m. March 4, 2008

Why does this article not clearly point out that it is currently LEGAL to carry a loaded weapon in public WITHOUT any permit at all? A concealed weapon permit allows you to conceal that weapon because without the permit you can carry the weapon, but cannot conceal it. The second amendment guarantees us this right to carry a weapon and we don't need a permit for that and we certainly don't need a state law that attempts to take away our 2nd amendment right.

Michael Peterson | 2:24 p.m. March 4, 2008

Does anyone know who is pushing for changes in the carry laws? And Why? Also, does this over-ride a city ordinance on open carry?

The Utah constitution limits the scope of such laws in favor carry laws; I hope they are aware of that.....I know, they are lawmakers, but you never know.

MagnaMom7 | 6:01 p.m. March 4, 2008

We have some very conservative/pro-gun legislators and activists - but we also have some very liberal/anti-gun legislators.

This article was certainly not the best, failing to name several of the individuals involved -- such as the bill's sponsor (Curt Oda, one of the "good guys") and those who suggested the amendments.

I recommend going to the leg home page and listening to the floor audio.

Comments continue below

I'm Batman | 7:12 p.m. March 4, 2008

This will really help crime go down the drain. Even in Utah you are not safe in many places without your own weapon for protection. That Trolley Square incident would have been over in seconds if those patron victims had guns of their own. But former Mayor Rocky Anderson doesn't believe in guns nor did he do anything about it!

Just a Guy | 7:42 p.m. March 4, 2008

I guess it is good that they are "Clarifying" the law....but that is really all they are doing. Utah has always been an "open" carry state because there is nothing in the law that specifically prohibits it. I have had a CCW for several years now but I only carry when going to certain places where I feel the need to have my weapon with me. So many people get this impression that those of us with CCW's are nuts running around with guns all the time and that's just not the case. Open carry in some situations just doesn't make sense...and in others it certainly does. Way to go legislators for clarifying this law!!!!

Tumbleweed Tom | 10:44 p.m. March 4, 2008

The amendment prohibiting open carry on college campuses but allowing it in elementary, jr. high and high school makes sense. High school kids can probably handle seeing a teacher or other responsible adult carrying a gun in a holster and think nothing of it. On the other hand, U of U "geniuses" and their nutty professors would probably stampede, pile up like poultry in a panic and smother each other. Can you imagine anything as inflammatory and terrifying to U of U students and profs as a Colt resting peaceably in a leather holster? Eat your heart out Stephen King.

MagnaMom7 | 9:01 p.m. March 5, 2008

On a related note, SB157 Rights of Citizens to Carry Firearms in Declared Emergency ("the Katrina bill") has just passed the House ---
Congrats and THANK YOU to Sen Mark Madsen and Rep Carl Wimmer!

gunney1976 | 6:51 p.m. June 26, 2008

Utah's constitution is very clear- I have the individual right to keep and bare arms for self protection. The CCW law in itself is an infridgement to that right and only serves one purpose. That is to generate revenue for the state as shown by its policy of issueing CCW to no-residents. I have no objection to having a background check, or demonstrating that I am a qualified shooter. As a senior citizen on a limited income I resent the State charging me for a right which is already mine, granted under Art.1 Sec. 6 of the Utah Constitution.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.