Reader comments
Wal-Mart zone change opposed in Sugar House
54 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Business
Across Site
- Baghdad's romance grows with...
- ASU Art Museum explores miracles in...
- Venezuela's opposition picks Chavez's...
- Montana ski town's welcome for...
- Zac Posen at Fashion Week looks to...
- Carnival goes to the dogs with Rio...
- Zac Posen at Fashion Week looks to...
- Halfway through Fashion Week, fierce...
- Thakoon's collection: red leather,...
- Carmen Marc Valvo's Fashion Week...
In Business
Across Site
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- U.S. taxes more progressive than Europe
- Obama budget: New spending with...
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Hong Kong asserts identity to...
- Greece passes new austerity deal amid...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
- Victoria Beckham back to sexy,...
- Boeing says it's frustrated with...
- Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
In Business
Across Site
- Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - 19 at Gateway look to City Creek
15 - US taxes more progressive than Europe
8 - Fashion Week trends: Military looks...
7 - Penn class teaches students how to...
6 - Designers lend their glamour to Obama...
6 - Dresses locked behind harnesses at...
6 - Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
5 - Pepsico to cut 8,700 jobs; 4Q net rises
4












And the movie theatre certainly didn't make it.
I think Walmart is one of the few chains that could possibly make it work. I suggest you strongly consider a zoning change so that a new store can be build, one that is energy effecient, one that will increase the value to the area.
The area has been commercially zoned for over forty years now and remains so. A balance of commercial, residential and recreational space already exists; a new Wal-Mart will not upset that balance. Considerable public funding has been expended to create bike and pedestrian paths along Foothill and Wasatch Boulevards and very recently a bike/pedestrian bridge was built to span the areas above and below those streets.
A successful Wal-Mart will increase the tax base needed to fund projects such as those cited above. It will also provide entry-level jobs for area residents, including our teenagers.
Yes, I fully support Wal-Mart's rezoning plans and encourage opposing residents to rethink their objections. As pointed out in last night's Sugarhouse Community Council Meeting, a variety of retailers or a strip-mall situation could very well be worse than what Wal-Mart has proposed.
As to unlimited money. Why should a company have to pay twice as much to remodel an old ill-fitting store, when it can tear it down and rebuild a store to their own specifications. Just because you have money, doesn't mean you should spend it foolishly.
Walmart does not generate anything but money for the mothership, eyesore storefronts and endless expanses of parking lot.
All because as Americans we are unwilling to pay a fair price for products made in this country.
The allure of being a piece or garbage shirt made in Sri Lanka or Nicaragua is just to great.
On the serious side, shed a tear for the many people who are going to have to work forced part time on slave pay to keep that Mart running so soup can be 10c cheaper.
Wal-Mart will bring a great deal more traffic to the Parley's area..... not to mention Foothill Blvd. Have you ever tried to get get out of the K Mart parking lot and go Northbound on Foothill? It's nearly impossible. Therefore, traffic will go down Parleys and through the neighborhoods directly west of the existing K Mart property.
I vote that they turn the property into a park and call it good.
I would welcome any store but walmart - target, a super blue boutique...anything but walmart.
I live in the area and we don't need a walmart at all.
Answer your own ignorance by doing a little research - Target treats their employee base like gold compared to walmart.
I doubt it, but it's possible.