Reader comments
Officer cleared in theater fight
29 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Gay rights and religious liberty
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







That policeman's conduct shocks my conscience. I guess it doesn't shock anyone else's conscience since we've moved more to a police state since 9/11.
FYI: A Darwin Award is a tongue-in-cheek honor named after evolutionary theorist Charles Darwin. "Awards" have been given for people who "do a service to Humanity by removing themselves from the Gene pool", i.e., lose the ability to reproduce. It is for people who kill, or in rare cases, sterilize themselves accidentally by attempting to do stupid feats.
Explain how Lpack's or Police Abuse's comments qualify them for recipients of the Darwin Award, oh intelligent one.
Even if Castillo seemed threatening while confronting Curtis, if it's true that Curtis was cussing and yelling at them throughout the movie, one can make the argument that Castillo was provoked. If he had become angry because of how Curtis was speaking to him, even though Castillo was talking during the movie, it could appear that Curtis was trying to get him angry so he could arrest him.
The one thing the article says that I find interesting is that Curtis' behavior did not shock the conscience. Even though his behavior could have been out of line, as long as it did not "shock the conscience" then it was okay. I have an issue with that - there is a fine line between inappropriate behaviour and behaviour that is "shocking to the conscience".
Anyway, I think the cop got lucky.
The article says boyfriend, Castillo approached Curtis demanding an apology. Even if Curtis didn't apologize, how did this blow up into the confrontation it did? Someone's not telling the truth, and my guess would be the ones who approached the officer. I'm sure if Curtis would have just been the average Joe Blow, and no police agency - government behind him where Castillo and Arnold knew they wouldn't have a chance to get any money, no one would have heard about it, nor would it have gone to court.
The literacy parade has passed you by. The plaintiff lost and should have. Her escort on the night of this event made a lot of money because an 'off the clock' officer became emotionally involved and made a poor judgement call. He had a number of options available to him and choose poorly, thus, writing a check drawn on the tax payers account. Perhaps you could enroll in a basic English class to help you with the written word.
Isn't it possible the officer ran into one of those groups of people who think they have more rights than others?
Have you ever been in a theater where someone just wouldn't shut up?
I was in a theater where the loud mouths were right behind me kicking my seat before the movie even started. When I asked them to stop kicking my seat they wanted to fight about it. Then a group of other patrons decided to escort the "men" out of the theater. Some of the patron escorts were "off duty" cops. Sometimes keeping the peace means being a cop at the movies or the mall. How many of you �police abuse� accusers think the off duty cop in the Trolley Square shooting was police abuse. The guy wasn't shooting at him. He was off duty and not in his jurisdiction. Perhaps he should have quietly asked the manager of the mall to have the killer leave the mall instead of protecting others from insanity. Cops should never �mind their own business� unless you mean the business of keeping the peace.
This guy initiated, escalated, shoved someone down, muddied the reputation of honorable police everywhere, left us taxpayers with the bill for his arrogance, and now shows his face like the righteous peace officer for tv interviews.
Citizens do not have to shut up and do what a bully like this guy says when he is having his little power trip. Why are we battered with misbehavior from our protectors?
We, the citizens, need to fire this bully. He shoved this person down the stairs and offered no medical interest in what damage may have been done.=. Maybe she was hurt, maybe not, but what if she was desperately hurt and he rendered no aide?
Society if losing faith in the police? These guys have got to act better.