Reader comments
Billionaire James Sorenson leaves his fortune to charity
51 comments | Read story
Thank you Sorenson Family for setting a great example..
No it shouldn't be the top story since it must be viewed as less important (which it is) for the readers of the Deseret News. As great as Mr. Sorenson's contributions have been can you really classify all of them as "true philanthropy"? Do you recall some years back (in the 90's) that he was all set to make a generous donation to the University of Utah, even had a big announcement about it, but when the university didn't want to put his name on the building or wherever he wanted it, he withdrew his offer? Maybe today's announcement is his way of saying, "Gee, I guess I might have appeared a little conceited back then and I'm sorry."
Nevertheless, this is a great thing he is doing for humanity, donating his personal wealth to charity.
The example of this man...(who I only know becuase of the news articles and some television coverage over the past many years) has inspired me to be more aware of those things that I might do to give back to the community, nation and world that has given me so much.
Thank you James LeVoy Sorensen and may God bless you, your family, and those charged in the stewartship of your departing wishes.
What a classy man to continue giving for years to come, even after his death and shame on you Jon Huntsman, Sr.
I think that you are wrong. I think that people should receive some recognition for their charities. People usually don't get rich by sitting around doing nothing. They get rich by taking risks and going against the narrow minded ways of their peers, and doing things that others wouldn't think of. They usually have a lot of opposition along the way. Some even suffer great financial difficulties until they finally have success.
Their name on a building only shows people what they believe in and where they choose to donate. It's a way of letting the world know what they think is important. Why shouldn't they be recognized?
I get what you are saying, but I think that it is ignorant to think that they are only being selfish.
Go to Glenn Beck's website and listen to the interview and you will hear (at about minute 30) him talking about going to a billionaire's funeral last week (this was taped on Jan 31). How many billionaire's do you know who died in the last week and had their funeral. I know you will think what you want (assuming you are a great niece of Huntsman)but the fact remains that alot more people knew who Huntsman was than Sorenson, based on the fact that Huntsman announces most of what he gives away. I grew up where Huntsman is from, I know several of his kids, daughters in laws, etc. so I do know of the extent of his giving. All I am pointing out is that based on what he said in the Glenn Beck interview, he was clearly talking about Sorenson. Millions of people listen to Beck's show, and I can imagine that there were other's from Utah who heard and thought the same thing. Huntsman really ought to cover his tracks on this one. Either that or be quiet.
If the U thinks they are all that then so be it. However, I had always thought the U approached Mr. Sorenson about naming rights not the other way around.
To Whoa Nellie and others who claimed Sorenson's motives were suspect in the UofU medical center debacle that the students selfishly either started or exascerbated: you illustrate who judgmental we as a society are, and how unwilling we are to check our facts. Don't let a little thing like facts get in the way of your appetite to criticize rich people who have done more for the world financially than you ever will (or I).
I am laughing, and laughing hard, at those who have found a way to criticize a man for donating perhaps $4.5 billion to charity. You who do so seem so petty and childish.
And he didn't give to a million other deserving charities. His money, his choice.
With all the political talk these days of taxing the greedy rich people I love to see contributions made by very, very rich people. Long live the capitalist AND the philanthropist! You can't have the one without the other.
What a huge, massive, major, waste of desnews.com cyber-space...
It seems you are willing to continue the pathetic attempts at class envy that I'm reading in these comments.
It is, generally speaking, the market that determines wages and not the employer. If they pay too much, someone will come in the market and pay the employees and thus charge less to their customers. Companies that do not pay their employees the "going rate" go out of business.
To provide stable employment and a means of an income is VERY Christian. So yes, it is noble for an employer to look out for their employees by paying them the market rate.
Think of what that could do for the economy in Utah...
Kudos to him for giving it all away...
I am sure you will miss him greatly.
decisions. "So What!" claims to know what Jim Sorenson did or did not do with his hard earned money. It is more than obvious to me, as someone who knew Jim well, that "So What!" knew nothing of Jim Sorenson. In the Bible Jesus' bother Jude said,"Men speak evil of whatever things they know not" Jude 1:10 NIV.
An interesting statement made by the brother of one so misunderstood. Jim and Beverley Sorenson understand the Gospel of Jesus Christ. "But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth" Matt 6:3 KJV
They have been quite workers in God's army. There are reasons the general public have not been made aware of the generousness of the Sorenson.
Again I ask, why would anyone suppose they knew anything about someone else's financial or any personal decisions? Why do some suppose they should judge another; another whom they do not even know?
For those who are determined to qualify Jim Sorenson's philanthropy, how about waiting until you have donated 5 billion? Shannon Smith, niece
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- L.A. to vote on pot ordinance 7:29 a.m.
- Storm pounds Midwest, New England 7:24 a.m.
- Congress mulls college playoffs 7:21 a.m.
- Stock futures indicating higher open 7:17 a.m.
- Obama announcing $600M for health 7:16 a.m.
- Haws playing like a veteran 12:36 a.m.
- Hot Rod behind mic for Lakers 12:35 a.m.
- Jazz go up against 'the best' 12:33 a.m.
- Sports on the air 12:26 a.m.
- Bobcats stun high-flying Nuggets 12:23 a.m.
- Snow brings big chill
- BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
- Yet again, we learn BCS is a big joke
- Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
- Cougars in better mood about bowl
- Expert calls Mitchell delusional
- Ranking the bowl games
- Williams' late jumper tops Spurs
- $2M error could mean layoffs
- Witness: Mitchell stalked victims
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
278 - Letters: Global warming a lie
217 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
205 - BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
165 - Cougars going back to Vegas
148 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
143 - George lost in rivalry hatefest
119 - Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
110 - Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony
99 - Revive full food tax?
94
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette writer Joyce Gannon offers the following advice...
I guess Gore lied about this as he did with his development of the...
Is BO admitting that the porkulus didn't work? Since the porkulus didn't...
The building retrofits do two things -- one, create immediate jobs in the...
For anyone not to think about and crave sex is abnormal. This study is...
Umm... what? 12:23 I'm not sure I agree or disagree with the original...
I'm a HUGE BYU fan. Nice win. But I'm saving all of the overconfident...
Paul, I suspect those profs do know something about the constitution, but...
thanks to the city council. Now SLC will look more like Potterville than...
Doug will never stop complaining until the Y makes it to the BCS NC game with...
In the summer of 1971, (a young boy of 12 years old), I had the opportunity...

