Reader comments
Billionaire James Sorenson leaves his fortune to charity
51 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Business
Across Site
- Boeing says it's frustrated with...
- Obama budget: New spending with...
- U.S. taxes more progressive than Europe
- Occupy protesters target California...
- Fashion Week trends: Military looks...
- Alexander Wang gets Gisele Bundchen...
- Dresses locked behind harnesses at...
- Christian Siriano brings on creatures...
- Conservatives shrug at Obama birth...
- US general discusses crackdown with...
In Business
Across Site
- Homeowners in distress hope new...
- Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Hong Kong asserts identity to...
- Working at home improves employee...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
- Vatican besieged by leaks, conspiracies
- Crumbling Minn. Capitol reaches...
- West finals: Rural residents strike...
- Greek parties mull harsh new cuts
In Business
Across Site
- Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - 19 at Gateway look to City Creek
14 - Fashion Week trends: Military looks...
7 - Designers lend their glamour to Obama...
6 - Penn class teaches students how to...
6 - Dresses locked behind harnesses at...
6 - Foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
4 - Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
4 - Bill aims to ban Internet gambling
4







Thank you Sorenson Family for setting a great example..
No it shouldn't be the top story since it must be viewed as less important (which it is) for the readers of the Deseret News. As great as Mr. Sorenson's contributions have been can you really classify all of them as "true philanthropy"? Do you recall some years back (in the 90's) that he was all set to make a generous donation to the University of Utah, even had a big announcement about it, but when the university didn't want to put his name on the building or wherever he wanted it, he withdrew his offer? Maybe today's announcement is his way of saying, "Gee, I guess I might have appeared a little conceited back then and I'm sorry."
Nevertheless, this is a great thing he is doing for humanity, donating his personal wealth to charity.
The example of this man...(who I only know becuase of the news articles and some television coverage over the past many years) has inspired me to be more aware of those things that I might do to give back to the community, nation and world that has given me so much.
Thank you James LeVoy Sorensen and may God bless you, your family, and those charged in the stewartship of your departing wishes.
What a classy man to continue giving for years to come, even after his death and shame on you Jon Huntsman, Sr.
I think that you are wrong. I think that people should receive some recognition for their charities. People usually don't get rich by sitting around doing nothing. They get rich by taking risks and going against the narrow minded ways of their peers, and doing things that others wouldn't think of. They usually have a lot of opposition along the way. Some even suffer great financial difficulties until they finally have success.
Their name on a building only shows people what they believe in and where they choose to donate. It's a way of letting the world know what they think is important. Why shouldn't they be recognized?
I get what you are saying, but I think that it is ignorant to think that they are only being selfish.
Go to Glenn Beck's website and listen to the interview and you will hear (at about minute 30) him talking about going to a billionaire's funeral last week (this was taped on Jan 31). How many billionaire's do you know who died in the last week and had their funeral. I know you will think what you want (assuming you are a great niece of Huntsman)but the fact remains that alot more people knew who Huntsman was than Sorenson, based on the fact that Huntsman announces most of what he gives away. I grew up where Huntsman is from, I know several of his kids, daughters in laws, etc. so I do know of the extent of his giving. All I am pointing out is that based on what he said in the Glenn Beck interview, he was clearly talking about Sorenson. Millions of people listen to Beck's show, and I can imagine that there were other's from Utah who heard and thought the same thing. Huntsman really ought to cover his tracks on this one. Either that or be quiet.