Reader comments
Filter cleans up films legally
26 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Committee will explore new '22...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Gay rights and religious liberty
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







Don't watch them. Turn off the t.v. send the children out to play, give them activities that use their imagination, and read together with your family!
When you do want to watch a movie as a family, be very careful! There are a "few" out there worth watching.
At our home PG means "pretty gross" and R means "Rancid".
There have been many movies we have started and turned off! Have the courage to stand a little bit taller than the rest!
I edit the movies my grandchildren see by not viewing them when we watch movies. I have explained to them that when they are mature enough and old enough, they will be able to see and do all the adult things they want, but not now.
If a person is desirous of living a good witness, then the halfway behavior of making objectionable movies acceptable is like hanging around with drunks and saying you only drank tea. If you want to be part of the world that enjoys the kind of movie that needs to be filtered, maybe you need to look past the movie itself and consider the motivation that drives a person to want to be associated with a movie that can not be viewed in its original form.
-Pete
Our biggest problem now is watching films in the theatre. Until you see them without the language, you don't realize just how much there is!
So refreshing to put that aside!
I do not believe that those companies doing the editing were breaking the law and I do not think that the judge in this case ruled correctly and I believe that our copyright laws are flawed all because money can buy anything in this world. If I went and bought the Mona Lisa (which I wish I had the money to do) I can do whatever I want with it. I can slash and burn it if I want. I can hire someone to paint over it if I want. If I buy a reproduction of it I can do the same.
These people that were editing the movies were doing the same thing. They were buying the movies then altering them for themselves or customers. To say this is hindering the "creative or artistic" nature is pure poppycock. The movie industry is full of megalomaniacs who do not see their real opportunity. Airlines and others do deals with them to edit their shows, why not offer those to the public. Bytheway honest Abe you profane his good name with your air of superiority.
Rather an odd post. I'm still trying to understand where you're coming from, and why you're so agitated about someone else's choice of what they see or hear.
As for us, we actually don't have any children left at home. Nothing "cosmetic", or even "righteous" about it, not "afraid" of anything�we just don't care to listen to foul language. It offends us, simple as that. That make it any easier to understand?
It does "agitate" me that that people take such means to alter movies. I feel very passionate that they are forms of expression and should not be altered. Thats a slippery slope. And I do not understand the motivation, especially absent of the "for the children" umbrella. Why cant you make the distinction of not not wanting to use foul language or having used toward you and simply hearing it on a movie separate from reality. Articulate the objection for me. Why would you care? That being said, if it is deemed legal to alter these movies then that is completely your perogative and im not going to argue with that. That would be absolutely your right just as it is mine to be "agitated" about it. I simply do not understand the motivation to do so.