Reader comments
Plans for Cottonwood Mall leap forward
44 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












It is quite concerning that more residents don't speak up in outrage. Let's take away from the students to give to businesses...
This 25% is an increase of roughly $700,000 a year more then they are getting now. And at the end of the 20 year period, they will be getting almost $4,000,000 more then they are getting now.
They aren't losing any money the decision. They are in fact going to be getting more.
So would all of the people who are upset that the School District voted for this be willing to get more money without losing money?
This is something that everyone should want the School District to do. Think of the children first. Thankfully, they did.
In all seriousness, it isn't a bad idea to theme it. I think a great mall is to take it one step further and completely replicate Venice with the square, Il Doge's palace, St. Peters Shoppilica, the Bridge of Sighs (could be a cool location for books or computer stuff or Spencers gifts) and the Rialto bridge. I would shop there.
The main problem the county had with it was that the hotels that were "funding" the stadium are all in Downtown SLC and the stadium is in Sandy where the "funding source" will not see an impact.
If the stadium would have been allowed to be in Downtown SLC like originally planed prior to Curtis stepping in and trying to take the glory, the County wouldn't have had a problem with it.
This story is about the Cottonwood Mall redevelopment. Which will not take money away from the school district but will rather give them more.
GSD doesn't write a check to anyone, and they aren't "gambling" with the kids' money (as Van Tassell from the Taxpayers Assoc said last night). If anything, the gamble would be for the Board to have voted no in hopes of luring another developer in without the RDA status. And ooh boy - then we could watch the mall sit vacant for another 2-3 years and watch the traffic at Macy's and TGIF totally dry up - wouldn't that be the way to go?!
Here's a story problem for all you well-educated "tax advocates": do I want $171k (and shrinking) to spend on our kids, or do I want to give them $900k/year now and $4 MILLION+ in a few years? Hmmm - let me think about that one...
Granite School DIstrict is in the mall development business?
I thought they were supposed to be teaching kids to read and write, and that schools are all begging for money.
I guess I was wrong, they have $52M laying around [forcibly taken from us TAXPAYERS!] to "invest" in some Ponzi scheme that may pay more someday?
This is WRONG on so many levels!
Never, NEVER! again tell me our schools need more money!
VOTE AGAINST EVERY POLITICIAN WHO SUPPORTS THIS NONSENSE!
Where were all the naysayers when the board met? More than 200 people attended the meeting and only two spoke against the project -- one of them being with the Utah Taxpayers Assn. -- and his remarks were comical. The other was a gentleman who opposes the principle of tax increment funding. He presented his opinion in a most impressive manner.
www dot cityofholladay dot com - Cottonwood Mall section on the left menu.