Reader comments
Utah's coal reserves raise a burning question

10 comments   |   Read story

Kirk Sorensen | 9:10 a.m. Jan. 13, 2008
There is a lot of talk about "sequestering" the carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. It is very difficult to safely sequester billions of tonnes of gas underground without it leaking over geologic time. Consider that in its present form, coal is sequestered carbon, and very stable. Perhaps for the sake of miners' lives, our air, our health, and our planet we ought to leave the coal right where it is right now.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Watt | 9:20 a.m. Jan. 13, 2008
This was a great, informative piece, no matter what your stance on global warming or energy policy. I was surprised at what a short lifespan is predicted. The Kaiparowitz field, which I incidentally don't want mined at this time, will no doubt be revisited in the future. At what point will Americans (and others) start seeing coal and oil as more valuable as a source of material for plastics, etc, rather than just burn it for transport and electricity production? Many of the most valuable substances we are surrounded by are derived from these fossil fuels.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Great idea... | 7:46 p.m. Jan. 13, 2008
...Kirk! Sounds like you've got it all figured out. What do suggest we replace coal with to produce the electricity needs in Utah? And BTW, are you personally willing to pay 4 to 8 times more than you're paying now for electricity?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Zzyzx | 9:38 p.m. Jan. 13, 2008
Dr. Ron Paul has discussed returning federal lands to the states. If Kaiparowits was once again a part of the state trust lands, how much revenue would it generate for the education fund?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Kirk Sorensen | 7:46 a.m. Jan. 14, 2008
...Kirk! Sounds like you've got it all figured out. What do suggest we replace coal with to produce the electricity needs in Utah?

Replace coal with thorium. Thorium has roughly a million times the energy density of coal and enough has been mined, processed, and buried in the desert in Nevada (in sealed drums) to supply Utah with energy for decades.

Research at Oak Ridge National Lab in the 1950s and 60s showed how thorium could be used as an energy source in a super-safe, super-efficient reactor that uses thorium in liquid-fluoride salts. Recent peer-reviewed work by Dr. Ralph Moir of Lawrence Livermore National Lab shows that these reactors will be far less expensive than today's solid-core uranium-burning reactors.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Doug Wendel | 10:51 a.m. Jan. 14, 2008
This article states that most of the cost of sequestering CO2 is for separating it out. If the plant effluent was used to grow algae and produce biodiesel, the algae would separate the CO2 for you and you could recover much of your costs by selling the biodiesel. Check out the Central Utah Biodiesel Project!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Gary | 6:29 p.m. Jan. 15, 2008
with the price of fuel over $3.00 a gallon I believe coal is the answer to the nations energy crisis, With the strike of a pen Bill Clinton done away with years and years of energy I hope the kaiparowits plateu will be revisited soon by a President who is really concerned with people, The good Lord never made coal to be left in the earth.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Kirk Sorensen | 9:31 p.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Funny, I figured the good Lord put that coal in the Earth so it wouldn't have to end up in my children's lungs.

When the Lord sees fit to make his position on coal known to us, then you can quote it. Until then, I suggest keeping speculation to a minimum.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Jim French | 7:49 p.m. Feb. 14, 2008
45 years at current usage...with Utah's population predicted to keep rising, usage will undoubtedly rise, and that 45 years will shrink. Climate change and pollution aside, it seems as though it would be smart to start planning for life after coal here in Utah. Thorium sounds interesting. Is it polluting? How water intensive is the energy producing process? Concentrating Solar and Geothermal also seem like they deserve a seat at the table.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
terry in indiana | 7:36 p.m. March 23, 2009
this , to me , seems just one more theft from the american people. the coal in Utah belongs to the people of america. Like the fresh water in our great lakes and the oil in the 'green river formation' these natural resources are not to be stolen from the people in order to bankrupt this country and force us into a world government. think of this; the great lakes is the single largest supply of fresh water in the world. at the east end of lake ontario the fresh water flow to the ocean is approx. 1.825 million gallons per second or 109.5 million gallons per minute or 6.57 billion gallons of fresh water lost to the atlantic ocean per hour. yet the southwest states were told to forget it when they wanted to harvest approx. six million gallons of water per day from lake superior. OR: the oil shale in the green river formation(utah, colo. wyo.). according to Rand. america has ,recoverable, 800 billion barrels of oil which Shell oil tells us would cost about $25. per barrel to market. Today 3/23/09 the price is $55.00 per barrel on the world market.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
In News Across Site

No. Utah sees a major earthquake every 350 years. Last one? 350 years ago.