Reader comments
Process would make coal burn cleaner

1 comment   |   Read story

Doug Wendel | 10:54 a.m. Jan. 14, 2008
Sorry, I made the following comment elsewhere and thought I was commenting on this article.

This article states that most of the cost of sequestering CO2 is for separating it out. If the plant effluent was used to grow algae and produce biodiesel, the algae would separate the CO2 for you and you could recover much of your costs by selling the biodiesel. Check out the Central Utah Biodiesel Project!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

So is ABBA going to reunite and perform at the induction ceremony? That...

I would agree that coach Whit gets his players ready for bowlgames better...

To "Red | 9:51 a.m." it is hard to get absolute numbers for deaths since the...

I WILL GLADLY PAY MORE TAXES IF IT GOES TO EDUCATION!

This is needed. Would you like to know why? Well, on a local...

The fact that no programs have hired away any of BYU's assistant coaches...

I'm just glad that Bronco only thinks I'm "uneducated" and doesn't "hate" me:)

Letters: Palin doesn't owe GOP

Mary | 10:58 a.m. I think it was the Democrats who brought Marilyn Monroe...

The Jazz are such an embarrassment. Another year and no title for the Jazz....

This jazz team is not the same as the one of old, if thats what you mean by...

Advertisements