Reader comments
Process would make coal burn cleaner

1 comment   |   Read story

Doug Wendel | 10:54 a.m. Jan. 14, 2008
Sorry, I made the following comment elsewhere and thought I was commenting on this article.

This article states that most of the cost of sequestering CO2 is for separating it out. If the plant effluent was used to grow algae and produce biodiesel, the algae would separate the CO2 for you and you could recover much of your costs by selling the biodiesel. Check out the Central Utah Biodiesel Project!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

RSL heads to MLS title game

Talked to Andy after the game... he was way stoked to be back in the finals...

Exactly. They are calling it double dipping but they would hire a teacher...

Band just fails to make final cut

This was not just a charity donation. That investment will pay dividends in...

Letters: A plea to senators

Im for single payer.

Great letter. The double dippers as you call them (I prefer to see them as...

I wonder if Mr. Ash will eventually write an article about how Joseph Smith...

How can he defend something he can't remember, I don't think he can even...

Where will the money come from?

Are students safe from predators?

The guy from Granite was right. This recent rash of cases isn't happening...

Wounded Utes limp home

Limp on to the "Who Cares Bowl" Utes!!! You are no good. What good team...

Advertisements
Advertisement