Reader comments
Cottonwood Heights OKs police force
11 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
97 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












I would much prefer to see a unified county wide police force instead of a dozen (or more) little fiefdoms with all the petty politics and egos involved and duplication of staff and facilities.
However, with the proven experience that the SL County Sheriff is not going to cooperate in meeting CH needs, if not directly disregarding contractual obligations, then CH must take the undesirable step of creating our own police force.
Lee - Winder is the one who killed the UPD. Cullimore was for it. By creating our own force, and having the interlocal agreements discussed above, we actually come closer to the original UPD idea.
Mark - the good news is that IF Russo gets the job, and IF we regret it, we can ask the council to fire him, instead of waiting for years for re-election time.
1. there will be no written interlocal agreements, all talk, no walk
2. UPD in the final form was not what was good for citizens, period
3. Russo may get a job, and well, have fun, it will be a wild ride but if you fire him you will be a disfunctional city with a mayor running a pd (officers will be picking up trash in the parks and driving the mayors kids around to give homecoming proposals) and a lame duck chief not being a leader, if you work for them well, poor worker bees