Reader comments
A majority of Americans have no idea what Mormons believe
316 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Faith
Across Site
- New president of the Maldives expands...
- Top Republican wants vote on birth...
- 'I Believe' license plates available...
- Fire destroys barn storing items...
- Army officer wants humanism...
- Will Islam embrace pluralism?
- Book review: 'Double Deceit' is the...
- Helping others avoid and overcome...
- Conservatives shrug at Obama birth...
- As Syria burns, neighboring Lebanon...
In Faith
Across Site
- 'Why I'm a Mormon': Steve Young
- Vai's View: Vai's View: The power of...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Ties that bind? How interfaith...
- The Restoration stands up to history
- Tips for making empty-nesters years...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Linda & Richard Eyre: Helping others...
- Steve Eaton: Home alone experience...
- Helping others avoid and overcome...
In Faith
Across Site
- Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - 'Why I'm a Mormon': Steve Young
29 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - The Restoration stands up to history
19 - Vai's View: The power of parenting
12 - Hatch says Obama violated freedom
12 - Temples are sacred, not secret
8







" ...the doctrine of Celestial -which was to say plural- marriage..."
Who did this research? I have a Celestial marriage, thank you, as have most of my friends, and there is no plurality of wives going on here. That would be against the law.
But the laws, they are a-changing, aren't they? If the states can allow men to marry men, and women to marry women, which was never sanctioned in the Bible, why can't a man marry as many wives as give consent, a thing that the law of Moses said was just fine? Just wondering...
Polygamy was the basis for the Reed Smoot trial, after two years of hearings one southern Senator said, "the issue here isn't about whether a man has more than one women or not, because I know some of you (senators)who have more than one woman. The issue seems to be whether they are called wives or not. As for me I would rather have a polygamist who doesn't polyig than a monagamist who doesn't monague.
Southern Baptists were Klan members, and their churches excluded blacks. Catholics have sex crimes and the Inquisition. But all the talk is about "The Mormon's".
He has put his finger on several of the key issues that face Protestants and Mormons as they face off and attempt to civilly establish a position of agreeing to disagree theologically.
A large portion of those who reject the Mormons as being Christian do so based upon their limited exposure provided to them by biased, misinformed would-be theologians.
When the truth is ultimately known, it will be discovered that the theology of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is most closely related to the tenets held by the church that Christ established.
Only then will we recognize that traditional Christianity is a result of the councils called to rationalize and compromise the positions held by a variety of factions contaminated by Hellenic, gnostic and other apostate philosophies.
However, in the final analysis, a presidential candidate should be selected by observing how well he lives his personal life and how he well manages his civil responsibilities and not by the tenets of his religious observance.
As for the "teaching that God and Jesus were once men"...doesn't all of Christianity believe that Jesus came down to earth in the form of man? i guess I missed the memo when Protestants changed their belief regarding this point of doctrine.
Why are the other clergy afraid?
While many, perhaps most, of the ministers are sincere individuals, it's also their income! LDS leaders work a full-time job to support their families, then work another steady part-time job unpaid, serving their neighbors.
When clergy of Protestantism and Catholicism join the LDS, and many have, they let go of a fairly easy job and all the prestige of the position.
But they do, because they have the courage of a divine witness that the work is God's, not just another man-made church.
Or else they stick with their vested interest in the prestige (and sometimes with a mob mentality), actively spreading a shallow, twisted version of "what Mormons believe" to keep their revenue source from getting interested. I've seen it happen repeatedly.
(Until a couple of years ago, Dr. Feldman of Harvard could have turned to the Dean of the Business School at Harvard for answers. Dr. Kim Clark left there to become president of BYU-Idaho. Another Harvard department head had just made a similar move a short while before.)
Today I am more and more convinced that Churches and religions are simply tools that conspiring men use to enslave other men. And in that there is an intense competition not just for the souls of men but also for their wealth.
I feel that it is this competition that fuels the animosity between religions in America and throughout the world.
It does't really matter what a church believes, it is regarded as a competive enemy in the religious arena.
Not many Blacks have entered the religion and they are for the most part not encouraged to join it.
Many mormons have grown with a racist attitude toward Blacks because of the Church"s postion on Blacks.
I'd guess you're not getting straight-up, satisfactory answers to those questions because it's dealing with doctrine that is not taught or emphasized in the church, and frankly, shouldn't be, given it's relevance(or lack thereof) to one's personal salvation.