Reader comments
A win in Iowa caucuses doesn't really mean much

5 comments   |   Read story

SLC Native | 5:17 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
I wonder if thissame article would have been written had Bernicks favorite boy won the prize? Chances are, it would have been very different. Oh well, just another day at the "Mitt Morning News".
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Abe Tschetter | 6:51 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
I totally agree with the first post. Had Mittney won, Iowa would just about have guaranteed the presidency and vindicated mormonism in the article. Somewhere, an angel would have received wings, probably.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
kv | 9:56 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
WOW, THAT WAS ONE OF THE MOST PATHETIC THINGS I'VE EVER READ!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Utah Resident | 11:38 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
Straight from Mitt's mouth: "In order to win the White House, I need to win both New Hampshire and Iowa"--Manchester Union-Leader, December 22. Now it's "just because you won the silver in one event doesn't mean you can't come back and win the gold". Romney's flip flops make even John Kerry look resolute and unchanging.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
cw | 11:23 a.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Very interesting. Actually, I know that some supporters are going to try to throw Utah to Ron Paul by electing delegates in support of him. Whether this is ethical or not is unknown?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
In Opinion Across Site