Reader comments
Phones, traffic linked
11 comments | Read story
If everyone talked on their phones while driving then everyone would enjoy that time savings and their lives would be better.
How does talking on a hands free cell while driving differ from talking to other people in the car? I doubt it's very different. If so it would make any cell phone driving legislation, as well as the bumber stickers, very unfair.
Other studies have shown that driving while holding and talking on a cell is no more impairing than driving while eating a hot dog. Should we legislate and make bumper stickers against that? Whine at any driver who does it? I hope not. We need to accommodate other drivers and their needs, even if it slows us down by one second per minute.
Actually, the most recent study conducted at the University of Utah (iirc) showed that talking on a cell phone was as likely, or more so, to cause an accident than being over the .08 BAC required for a DUI conviction.
I admit I do it if I'm expecting a call from my kid, for example. Then again, I also tailgate the heck out of the person in front of me if s/he is on the phone and not keeping up w/ traffic. How is that for rational behavior?!?!?
The scariest driver I ever saw was traveling while smoking with her left hand out the window, and talking on her cell with her right. Really scary!
I hope they do outlaw talking & driving -- I've seen what can happen when I let myself be distracted by my cellphone while driving, and I've seen how dangerous others can be -- yikes!
Please, let's hang up & just drive! Losing your life, or costing someone else theirs isn't worth 20 minutes saved somewhere else -- what if you don't make it there?!
Legislation will never pass making them illegal because then it would also have to be illegal to drive and eat a Big Mac or Whopper, etc, and some very large companies' lobbyists ain'ta gonna let that happen.
Shaving, putting on makeup, tying a tie, all are just as risky.
Bluetooth and other hands-free devices help, and voice dialing technology is getting better fast.
I had one of the first car cellphones, around 1982, and cops would pull up beside me and watch if I was talking. Never did get pulled over, though I heard of others challenged.
We did report a lot of speeding and dangerous drivers; maybe more good done than harm?
No Worries,
Your time is not worth anyone's life. Get a clue.
I don't talk on my cell phone because I don't want everyone jumping to the conclusion that I am going "slow" because I'm on my phone. I am driving safely. Whether I am on my phone or not has nothing to do with my speed. I will go 65 regardless. It is safer and better on gas mileage at the same time.
So all of you road-raged drivers who tailgate me and harrass me to move over- I'm already in the right-hand lane, I will not speed up for you, and by the way- get off YOUR phone. Go endanger someone else's life- not mine- and save your precious 19 seconds of time.
This article is flawed in that it doesn't define what speed the supposed "slow people" on their cell phones are driving. If they are driving 65, the fault should be with everyone else who is breaking the law by speeding.
Seems that the "world revolves around you". Seems like you meant we need to accomodate you. How about the talk time savings vs. the loss of life. How equitable is that?
Our lives would be a lot better without cell phones in general, not just driving. We're reachable for work all the time, half the calls we take or make aren't wanted. They're only good for emergencies. Oh and they're making us think of personal conversations in terms of task efficiency. That's no good either.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Iraq war vet bank robber sentenced 4:44 p.m.
- License requirements change Jan. 1 4:42 p.m.
- Alta subdivision denial leads to suit 4:41 p.m.
- Accord reached in Copenhagen 4:02 p.m.
- Tech stocks stop market slide 3:48 p.m.
- Charges filed in stalking Ben and Jen 3:39 p.m.
- 'Monk' actor to star in 'Tenor' 3:36 p.m.
- Web registration for H1N1 vaccine 2:52 p.m.
- Disabilities group seeks donations 2:52 p.m.
- Video game watchdog shuts down 2:40 p.m.
- Susan Powell's family saddened
- Police: Murder/suicide premeditated
- 4 people found slain in W. Jordan
- Oregon State helped refine Bronco
- 'Avatar' a visual feast, but plot fails
- Football forecast as predicted
- Frances Monson recovering well
- Barkley grills D-Will about 'tension'
- Cleopatra relic lifted from sea
- Jazz must juggle full roster
- Here are Max Hall's Top 10 wins
176 - It's official; Heaps signs with BYU
172 - Susan Powell's family saddened
161 - Conan mocks Orrin Hatch, Mormons
156 - Letters: 'Liberal conceit'
143 - Susan Powell notebook seized
115 - Jazz stunned by Timberwolves
114 - Josh Powell meets with WVC police
109 - Letters: Explaining Palin
105 - Sources: Josh Powell hires attorney
100
For the latest news in the health care debate and how it affects you...
Riley won't lead them past USU let alone the Utes
We could trade Boozer,AK and Miles to Memphis for Marc Gasol and Rudy Gay,we...
I am sorry, but we need to reliaze that they want to come home as well.....
I was disappointed at the tatoo. I always thought he was above all that....
They are a dangerous team with a good D and a very solid run game. That is a...
Same comment, same question.
These boards are funny. It reminds me of one of those Bing commercials where...
To "Dr. Freud | 4:13 p.m. " do you have anything to actually add to the...
No - I think it is important to know if it was the boy's mother that was...
Since many of you contend a majority of Americans favor this reform plan, for...



