Reader comments
Demos aim for council majority
14 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
95 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







The one party regime (GOP) in Utah has long forgotten who their constituents are and are pretty much "I'll rub your back and you'll rub mine" good ol' boy network.
That really depends. A narrowly divided partisan government is almost always better than one party rule, since the bare majority party wants to hold onto its majority it's not likely to do something that will infuriate the voters. Council Democrats will pay if they enact unpopular ideas like domestic partner benefits.
But what I'd really like to see are more members from outside of Salt Lake. Salt Lake City is now less than 18% of the county's population but make up 44% of the Council dur to the fact that all 3 At Large members hail from there.
The author of this article asked Democrats who they're running. How come he didn't ask if the Republicans have anyone to challenge Horiuchi?
The real issue of this campaign, as alluded to by another post, is that the at-large members really only represent their home town - SLC, throwing sops to the rest of the County to keep us from open rebellion. This Council is so SLC-centric that a move to Dem control would leave the rest of us without balanced representation. Can someone so focused on their own backyard really represent Herrimann? Or Midvale? Or West Valley?
The Dems may smell blood but they have yet to articulate - other than to "keep the peace" - how control of the Council would be better for the County as a whole. Some here have argued that control of the Council would bring balance. I would argue the opposite, a Republican controlled Council will balance a Dem County Mayor and a Dem SLC Mayor. The Legislative branch should check the executive. Keeping Republicans in control does that.
Then let's apply your arguments to the state Legislature. "The legislative branch should check the executive." I hope you will work then to either see a Democratic governor elected or more state legislators who are Dems. If the Republican Party continues to maintain its stranglehold on the state Legislature and state executive branch, then there exist obvious benefits of having another significant government body (SLCO or SLC) made up of Democrats. That is what will help provide a check on party politics -- instead of Republican rule at every level all the time.