Reader comments
New suit filed over Glen Canyon Dam

Dave | 8:04 a.m. Dec. 9, 2007

Hydro-power is one of the few sources of power whith no emissions. It's clear the enviros won't be satisfied untill man is on the endangered list.

Water is more important | 10:46 a.m. Dec. 9, 2007

Storing water is more important than losing sucker fish from that area. Fish can be planted elsewhere, but water is a commodity that is difficult to predict. The alternative, drought, is much worse than the complaints of environmentalists. If the resevoir is full, then let's let some out and cleanse below. Since the big mistake a several years ago that allowed tons of water downstrea, the area has not been able to recover the loss of that water.

Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you.

Lover of Lake Powell | 8:58 a.m. Dec. 10, 2007

Interesting that a week before Flagstaff based water groups declared northern Arizona needs to be able to tap into the Colorado River to meet their water needs. Pretty hard without a dam upriver.
-rich

Comments continue below

u got it backwards | 9:03 p.m. Dec. 10, 2007

Uh - its "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"...

As for the environmentalists - force them to put their money where their mouth is - turn off their water and let them find their own...

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.