Reader comments
Water conservation a safe bet for Vegas
4 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












SNWA General Manager at the Sept 11 hearings: �We have a new ethic to protect environmental resources� and �We have an environmental record beyond reproach�.
Before a newspaper ad campaign in Nevada suggesting the Water Authority is concerned about environmental issues associated with the pipeline project, this from the Nevada State Engineer�s Office: �State Engineer Tracy Taylor, in a 19-page decision, rejected an effort by lawyers for the SNWA to limit consideration of environmental issues in the hearings, scheduled Sept. 11-29 in Carson City. Taylor also rejected a Water Authority motion to exclude consideration of the effects on recreation and "scenic values" the ground water pumping and exportation could have.�
The alternative that would obviate the need for a pipeline, water conservation, is out of reach of Ms. Mulroy's thinking. She is in the pipeline and dam box that rang in another century. We need new thinkers and they will emerge as the water crisis unfolds.
Why then does the Southern Nevada Water Authority insist on going forward with this project instead of implementing Dr. Gleick�s recommendations? It�s because the water grab isn�t for Las Vegas. In fact most of the water (More than 75,000 AFY is destined for a location more than 75 miles north of Las Vegas�Coyote Springs, a sprawling new development that will eventually house 250,000 people and featuring 16 championship Jack Nicholas golf courses. In fact the maps accompanying the revised EIS for the project show the pipeline terminating at Coyote Springs. Conservation in Las Vegas will not supply the water needed for this development, a project designed to make worthless desert land priceless by taking water from someplace else� have you ever heard of Owen�s Valley ?