Reader comments
White evangelicals see 3rd party as option in Clinton-Giuliani race

Kevin | 7:49 a.m. Nov. 1, 2007

There you have it. The evangelicals the Republicans have pandered to all these years just left the Republican Party. Let them form their own party.

use correct word | 7:57 a.m. Nov. 1, 2007

I object to one word used in your article. You said those polled viewed Giulianiï¿½s views as too ï¿½moderate.ï¿½ The correct word is ï¿½liberal.ï¿½

Linda rowe | 7:18 a.m. Nov. 2, 2007

If evangelistic Christians choose to have a 3rd party candidate, then Mrs. Clinton will win the race without any doubt. Having a 3rd party candidate will weaken the Republican vote, and strengthen the Democratic vote. This very same thing happened when John McCain ran for President. He pressured people to vote for him, and the Democrats almost won the election.

As a strong evangelical Christian, I do not necessarily support the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, but I believe Mitt Romney is a very good candidate, and I believe he should be supported by Christians, rather than choosing a 3rd party Candidate.

Comments continue below

To: Linda Rowe | 1:23 p.m. Nov. 3, 2007

You suggested that Mitt Romney "should be supported by Christians".

Perhaps thats the difference between liberal Republicans and conservative Mormons.

Mitt Romney does not represent conservatives, nor does he represent Mormons. Mitt Romney is a fringe liberal and he is trying to side-swipe Fred Thompson in the same manner that John McCain tried to hijack the GOP from George W. Bush in 2000.

Mitt Romney is not wanted - nor welcome in the Party of Reagan.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.