Michael T. Packard | 8:44 a.m. Oct. 29, 2007
MVC will substantially reduce NOx pollution in the area. Much traffic that would have traveled on highly congested arterials, going just 6 to 18 miles per hour, will be able to travel at near freeway speeds.

Less time spent on the roads means less pollution for cars and trucks. Adequate and equitable freeway service to the western valley will more than double the speed on those super-congested arterials.

Diesel trucks and UTA buses produce 1/2 to 1/3 of the NOx pollution if they can go a steady 40 or 50 miles per hour , instead of being stuck in heavy stop and go driving. A study done for California Air Resources Board 6 years ago proved that.

So, pollution will go up a little near the freeway, but drop a lot along the decongested arterials. Net gain is cleaner air.

The Sierra Club actually supports dirtier air with their support of Commuter Rail.

Commuter rail will more than double the amount of NOx currently emitted by over 400 dirty diesel UTA buses. NOx will increase by over 420 tons a year.

The MVC freeway is good for our air. Build it!
Lance | 10:21 a.m. Oct. 30, 2007
Amen ... all the Sierra Club ever does is stall projects and wind up costing the tax payers extra billions, only to see the projects eventually go in anyway (aka, Legacy Highway). Meanwhile, tons of additional polutants are being pumped out while they are "protecting" the environment.

Maybe the ACLU should sue ....
Moose on the Loose | 8:58 p.m. Oct. 30, 2007
The problem with trying to build yourself out of congestion is that it simply never works. Just like buying bigger pants to deal with obesity doesn't work.... Yes, in the short run, congestion will be relieved, just as buying bigger pants eases the strain on the burgeoning waistline, but in the long run nothing will have been done to deal with why the problem existed in the first place. The Sierra Club is trying to address the problem by guiding alternative growth patterns that are not freeway dependent.

Btw - guess who is most interested in seeing this tranportation corridor built at tax-payer expense? BIG developers who are involved in west valley land speculation. They need this road or their projects will go bust.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Where in recorded history - anywhere - has a government based on dogma and...

Nobody cares about soccer. Will RSL please reimburse the Utah taxpayers now?

Same old story for Jazz

Maynor Miles Matthews Koufos Fesenko Milsap If I were the coach these...

If only! Beating BSU is unlikely, but look at the other upsets this year. If...

Ute fans are hanging their hats on "we scored more points than BYU, so...

Examples of effective summits please?

Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan

Why not make a trip to Romney stadium on Friday and cheer the locals "AGGIES"...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

It used to be that some people were bigots. Today,as many of thexe postings...

and Utah's pathetic defense gave up 55 to TCU, and it could have been worse ...

TCU creams U.

I am a Utah fan and my hope is that we will get to the point where our...

Advertisements
Advertisement