Reader comments
Roberts says judges' freedom has limits
16 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
76 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







1) There were four counts (the last one was incomplete) and all four showed Bush the winner in Florida (the last based on projections even by the Democrats).
2) Florida state law allowed for one recount and one only plus it defined the date for announcing the winner. Through judicial fiat in the State Supreme Court, Democrats coerced Florida to violate their own state laws with additional counts and additional time.
3) The US Supreme Court correctly enforced Florida state law as well as enforced national laws as they existed at the time.
In short, there were a set of national and state rules by which the election was to be conducted. The Democrats lost and decided they didn't like the rules after all. They are the ones that forced illegal activity with the third and fourth counts and with the schedule extension.
There was no judicial activism. The Supreme Court decided that Florida should adhere to the laws that were in place. It would have been activism if they had made any other decision.
In short, not a conspiracy.
Were they all hanging out at the Cougareat?