Reader comments
Tough migrant measure on track
33 comments | Read story
I'm sure it's meant to hurt legal immigrants who are helping out their illegal friends/family, but...
Who else harbors illegal immigrants? Any apartment owner, anyone who rents houses out. Would schools be included here? Preschools? Churches?
And who transports them? Taxi drivers? Bus drivers? TRAX? People who pick up hitchhikers?
So to avoided getting busted, do we now have to ask everyone we come in contact with, anyone we help in any manner, "can I see your papers?"
Yes, we might get sued, but someday the tide will turn and the politicians will buckle under. The alternative is to give the country away to third world illegal aliens. Take your pick.
And I get soooo tired of the rationale that we need to keep these workers because the economy will buckle under the deportation of these workers. How about those on welfare or unemployment taking these jobs?!?
Most of the undocumented workers where I live get paid under the table and send the bulk of their money back to Mexico...so not only are they taxing the system, but they're not paying taxes and they aren't helping the local economy by spending their money here.
William...for me it has nothing to do with the color of their skin or their religious beliefs...it has to do with following the law.
AC..."Most of these people just want to have a chance at a better life." Well, so do I, but I'm not going about it by breaking laws.
And for all of you people who say it is about the law, give me a break. You didn't drink before coming of age? You never speed? You have never cheated on your taxes? Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.
I have personal friends in France, Canada and Mexico and I love and respect each. They are all welcome to come and visit me and any of them would make great neighbors ... BUT if they would break the law to become my neighbor, I would have a real problem with that!
Now if the problem is getting the processing done for people to be here legally, that seems to me as easy to cure by putting some money into the agencies that do the processing under the current laws to eliminate the backlog THAT CAN BE DONE and it may be cost effective to do that.
In the meantime we can debate policy about who, how many, and under what conditions we will permit people to immigrate and become full citizens.
If I went to France (or a bunch of other places) & stayed illigally, I wouldn't be welcomed or allowed.
Goodbye, cruel, inept american government.
Once that law is changed, we can worry about the illegals.
All of you who claim you don't have issues with immigrants, just with the illegality of their actions...would you support a change in laws like I just mentioned?
If you don't, your real concern isn't people breaking the law.
Your problem might be that you're afraid of competition in the work force (in which case you probably need to consider getting a better education).
Or it might be that you're just racist (although you may call it something else).
I wonder if Senator Hickman got permission from the Church before he speaks about creating such a bill. Concerning illegal immigrating the LDS Church is the 800 pound gorilla sitting quietly in the room.
Paul, you should read the polls that the vast majority of Utahans want immigration laws enforced before you make ill-informed statements about the Republicans giving the election away by demanding tougher enforcement of immigration laws. BTW, you misused �whom� and it should be �our� not �are�
Jake P, if they were Canadian they would be deported in a heartbeat with no bleeding liberals crying racism in their support.
Anonymous, they have done things to endanger our borders. Debilitating drugs are funneled through by violent gangs. They destroy the environment cutting trails through delicate ecosystems and litter forests and campgrounds.
What part of our environment have drug smugglers destroyed? Where do you get your information? I invite you to read the Daily Herald more closely and be informed.
Companies could manufacturer more items with less workers. The workers would be retrained with skills to maintain, monitor and operate the machines/computers. New manufacturing jobs would open up because now we would be in a position to compete with countries such as China. No more importing goods that U.S. citizens use, that are made by foreign workers. This would in fact bring up the standard of living for the newly trained workers because they would be receiving higher wages. Producing more goods with less, but more highly skilled workers, is what this country should be reaching for.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Polygamist gets 33 years in Texas 11:40 p.m.
- Council candidates lining up early 11:37 p.m.
- Chamber opposes Herbert tax plan 11:37 p.m.
- Admin. fights giving Alta 2 acres 11:37 p.m.
- Benchings work for Rangers 11:33 p.m.
- Millionth Hogle Zoo visitor 11:32 p.m.
- NFL notes: Henry dies after fall 11:31 p.m.
- Volunteer Santas ready to deliver 11:31 p.m.
- Cleopatra relic lifted from sea 11:30 p.m.
- U. women to play South Dakota St. 11:30 p.m.
- Susan Powell's family saddened
- Susan Powell notebook seized
- Conan mocks Orrin Hatch, Mormons
- Here are Max Hall's Top 10 wins
- It's official; Heaps signs with BYU
- Genetic testing, ethical dilemmas
- Watching over the Sacred Grove
- David Archuleta's different mission
- Frances Monson recovering well
- Jazz open road trip with victory
- Here are Max Hall's Top 10 wins
152 - It's official; Heaps signs with BYU
149 - Conan mocks Orrin Hatch, Mormons
145 - Letters: 'Liberal conceit'
138 - Stay the course with our president
120 - Jazz stunned by Timberwolves
114 - TV mom gives birth to 19th child
113 - Susan Powell notebook seized
113 - Susan Powell's family saddened
110 - Josh Powell meets with WVC police
109
These days, more than half of adults actually want gift cards, those...
Great honor for Pitta. Congratulations to him the rest of the BYU program...
Heartbreaking to see the grief and worry on your faces. Utah sends prayers...
Are we discussing Boise State? Who cares about them! To me, this is...
"How come we have not heard anything from Josh Powells parents or his side of...
Talk about amateur hour. I feel like I'm back in Jr. High listening to the...
Lets revisit the orignal claim by Fine "Why did republicans[plural] create...
This is so exciting! I saw Noteworthy on The Book of Jer3miah web series...
Yewt fans are going to start making a bunch of classless comments. Just...
I believe a principal reason our country is great (and attractive to others)...
My wife and I have been seeing Dr. Kasper for almost three years. The...



It violates whose "equal protection" rights? Equal protection does not free one from the obligation of obeying the law. And how does this law override federal authority? The Oklahoma law doesn't decide who gets to be a legal immigrant and who does not. It's simply enforcing laws against people the federal govt aready says are illegal.
*** "Immigration is set by the federal government and enforced by the federal government," he said. "The main argument we have is the state of Oklahoma is trying to enforce immigration laws." ***
There all all sorts of state laws that duplicate federal laws. Hate crimes laws, laws against racial discrimination, laws against narcotics. I don't see Sharma and his ilk opposing state hate crimes laws.
Sharma & Co want open borders. That's all there is to it. They don't want the feds enforcing immigration laws, either. That's why they've sued the federal government to stop federal enforcement of the laws.