Reader comments
Let's face it: U.S. schools need reform
12 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
35 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
25 - Letters: Rights of conscience
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - The Gospel according to Obama
20












The real call for reform is that businesses have figured out that there is money to be made in education and they want their cut. It has nothing to do with educating students.
Thanks for your comments. I agree that the US Education system is long overdue for an overhaul that will allow us to compete globally. However, like or hate vouchers they show us the problem with reform. The teacher's unions only care about the teachers and have no interest in reform. They do not have the school children's best interest at heart; teachers might but the union doesn't.
I don't fault the union for taking this stance but we should not be confused about their intentions. The baseball players unions care about the players not fans, the auto workers union cares about their employees not the consumer, the teacher's union cares about teachers and not parents or kids.
I applaud Utah legislators for being willing to profer a solution. It may not be the right solution but it is an alternative. Although not optimistic, I call on the UEA to offer some solutions and alternatives. I have a feeling it will call for more money and no other changes.
I would be out of business if I wasn't willing to make major changes in how I do business. But very little change has taken place in education. Major changes must take place as we are falling behind in global competition in the eduation of our children.
In today's global economy the only constant is change, but the education industry (union) seems to want to continue to live in the past.
What does this mean? It means that elementary schools should be focused on teaching kids on how to learn, junior high schools should be focused on helping children learn the techncal and professional languages of the disciplines and communities they are interested in, and high schools should be focused on teaching competency in a core set of skills.
This means that students interested in science and engineering should actually understand how the scientific process works and should be comfortable in a lab setting... or students interested in journalism should understand what is involved in finding, filtering and then presenting informaiton in a consumable fashion. I suspect that you would be hard pressed to find either student graduating from any Utah school in the immediate future.
A second major failing involves a failure to adapt. Education is lifelong, but students don't see it that way. Many individuals stagnate because they lack the ablity to learn.
Some REAL reform is on the ballot in the Jordan District this election however. I hope people can see past those who are trying to pit one side against another and vote to create new, community school districts. Several states are watching and hoping we are successful. They want to do it too.
Also those who say that we do not offer students real world opportunities in public school should check out the Granite Technical Institute and the equivalent organization in Jordan District. I think they would be amazed at what public school is offering to children who take advantage of the opportunities.
We do need change and reform....we always have and we always will. What we have to be most careful about is maintaining the equalizing nature of public education (or better yet, enhancing that function; it has slipped quite a bit over the decades, I believe).
The educrats are so set on preserving the status quo that our students are now pathetic when compared to international students--but we're too dumb and happy in Utah to realize it. Anyone who does a little research can see the frightening picture immediately.
And for more information about the changes that are recommended, read the first chapter or two from any book written by E.D. Hirsch. There is a reason that a large percentage of charter schools use the Core Knowledge sequence and philosophy. Once a school is independent from the political establishment of traditional schools the board can do what is best for the students, unfettered by counterproductive rules and regs.
That piece, which I wrote --- "U. S. Academic Weakness: Root Causes" --- will be #1 of 2 million or so hits.
Another piece, "Hidden Bias in American Education" will illustrate why our current method of funding schools is doing much harm to children and families: