Reader comments
Study backs city-run force
4 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- View live stream of services for...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
89 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







The interlocal agreements would leave Cottonwood Heights exposed. In the event of a major event for the entire valley... who do you think the police forces of Sandy, Draper, and Murray will serve first? Cottonwood Heights? I think not.
Fleet maintenance? Search and rescue? K9? Crime scene techs? Dispatch? Vehicle storage? Vehicle equipment? Officer equipment? Officer training? Support and admin staff? Building costs and maintenance (like lawn care)? Specialists like school officers, public relations, citizen reps?
No one ever goes back to, say Taylorsville, and compares the ORIGINAL study with the ACTUAL costs several years into to their own department.
Media like the DN are quick to report the original study, but never go back in a couple of years and do a comparison. If they did, that would serve the community and reflect real journalism -- but it would take a lot of effort. You might find the "study" missed a lot of incidential and "other" costs and that the original study served the elected folk, but not the tax payers.
Consultants know who butters the bread, but ignore who pays the taxes.
Be careful! And DN, how about some followup to the other cities who did the same thing?
Fleet maintenance? YES
Search and rescue? This is a County responsibility
K9? YES
Crime scene techs? YES
Dispatch? YES
Vehicle storage? YES
Vehicle equipment? YES
Officer equipment? YES
Officer training? YES
Support and admin staff? YES
Building costs and maintenance? YES - although the study is based on leasing new space...
Specialists like school officers, YES
public relations, NO - other than standard city staff
citizen reps? YES - SAY officers and COP officers are included.
I do second your request that the media go back and compare Taylorsville and Draper's studies with actuall costs. That would be very instructive!!
Where? - I'd consider anything south of I-215 "South Valley" - sure Draper is further, but someone always is (until you're visiting penguins). I'd consider them an East side city as well.