Reader comments
Climate-change perception heartens professor
14 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- View live stream of services for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
90 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







So, perhaps the delay of the start of more Winter like weather next year will bolster the model and provide some evidence that the predictions based on it are worth more than they appear now.
As proved by the failure of so many other past predictions of the future, one really never knows the future very well. I suspect but am not certain that such will be true of 90% of the dire predictions based on “global warming”. We’ll just have to wait and see.
What's so bad that the sea level rises an inch or two over FIFTY YEARS. It's not like it's going to drown anybody.
The arctic ice sheet is melting. Good, we can cut the cost of shipping by shipping across the Arctic Ocean. Meaning more economic growth for the world.
Warmer weather means more food for the world. The article says more precipitation. Good, we'll have more rain over the summer and therefore we won't have to rely so much on the snow pack.
A warmer climate will help people migrate north and to help alleviate over population.
Doesn't any of the global warming alarmists see any good that can come from global warming. To every consequence to global warming I can name a benefit.
Warmer weather only means more food production in a few places that can actually benefit from it. Food production in many more places will decline.
Migrating to mitigate overpopulation only works if the places people are migrating from can still sustain a the pre-migration population. For every region on earth that becomes more habitable due to climate change, more regions become less habitable.
Hundreds of millions of people now live so close to sea level that higher storm swells due to higher sea levels will flood them out of their homes and farms. Get used to the term "eco-refugee," you're going to see a lot of these folks.
1) 30 years does not a climate change make. Too short. Besides, most of the 1 C increase was before 1940. How about the cooling 1945-1978?
2) No correlation exists between CO2 and temperatures, either short or long term. Temperatures correlate to solar output, not "greenhouse" gases.
3) Antarctic and Greenland ice packs are growing, not shrinking.
4) The peace prize for Gore is ludicrous. His self-promotional, political movie has nothing to do with peace, and is full of scientific inaccuracies.
Glaciers were shrinking and sea levels rising since the last ice age.
So like idiots we forcast rising sea levels, and like Jimmy Carter we want to rebuild New Orleans below current sea levels. When global warming fanatics stop the new orleans rebuild below sea level then maybe I'll get on board. Its the democrates crying wolf and the democrates rebuilding new orleans. Ya think they reeally believe global warming and that its caused by man.
Global warming or not, mankind cannot continue pumping all the gasses into the environment that we do and expect our descendents to be able to enjoy the beauties of the earth, which we enjoy in this era. We must take better care of our world.
A Google search comes back with zero hits when looking for his papers refuting the "inconvenient truth" hysteria of the 1970s and 1980s. Back then, the same breed of Chicken Littles were screaming about the coming Ice Age! If Wagner were so certain, why didn't he tell them that they were wrong?
The inconvenient fact (which overcomes any number of inconvenient truths) is that weather change comes from solar activity.
But nobody will buy a book titled "The Sun is Hot" . . .
Ya know, I really wish the thousands of scientists that are a part of the IPCC realized all of the "evidence" presented to us in these comments before they spent years and years actually doing the scientific work to promulgate lies and brainwashing...
Let's get more cavemen like Infhoe to say global climate change doesn't exist, rather than take measures to not only slow global climate change, but to positively effect change and break our dependence of oil.