Reader comments
What do Utahns Google? Answers may come as surprise
83 comments | Read story
Regarding the “dark” side (internet porn), there are at least two other factors which, I must presume, also play a very important role. Namely, the very high computer literacy and usage within Utah (usually ranked as one or two in the nation) and the very young average age of the state, the perennially youngest in the country.
Between the higher than average ability to access internet porn and the higher than average percentage of people whose raging hormones would tend to drive them to use that accessibility for some sexual gratification via pornography vicarious though it may be. Consequently, for those reasons alone, the Google search rankings ought to be no surprise at all.
In most of the United States, the acceptance of pornographpy is considered 'normal'. Even this article said it. Where society sees pornography as 'normal', a 'normal' person would be signed up for their favorite sites. They would have shortcuts on their web browsers and if they wanted to go to another site, they would simply go from their favorite to an advertised site that interested them. Therefore, they do not need to do searches or use a search engine.
In 'good old Utah', pornography is not considered 'normal' and is not commonly and openly accepted. So... a person wanting to view pornographic images would have to do a search each time to link into their favorite site. Thus bypassing a record being kept in the addresses of their web browser (imagine a wife looking for www.xray and www.xxxsexxx pops up as a suggestion to finish the address). By going through the search engine, a porno addict can more easily hide their tracks. Since it isn't 'normal' why would a person want it in their favorites?
The number one reason male students at BYU go to the counseling center is for sexual compulsion. The number one reason female students at BYU go to the counseling center is for eating disorders. These are real problems that need to be confronted.
The findings could be spun as Satan working harder to destroy the church.
Not only is this not PhD dissertation-quality, it's not even acceptable research for a high school paper. YOU CANNOT draw conclusions without correlating the searches. It's bunk, it's bad science, and it's designed to slander a city.
The U psychologist who tries to prop up the bad science should have her tenure pulled. This is so bad, it's Al Goreian.
(Of course, we could just stipulate that SLC != Mormonism and be done with it.)
Move on.
Before I went into recovery, I used Google as my primary tool for launching me where my lust-filled curiosity was taking me.
I should complain, too, that both Google Videos and YouTube (owned by Google) provide a near constant enticement to lascivious content in the offerings they provide in the margins. I've sent Google a request that they allow people to opt out of this soft-porn, but so far, it continues unabaited.
If you think that viewing pornography is okay and normal, I just want you to know that I would never allow anyone to watch my kids if I knew that they were looking at porn, even soft porn, even bras and swimsuits.
dblagen007 said something that unfortunately I have to agree with. Due to the secret nature of internet porn, parents must be on the offensive side and protect their kids from people who do porn. If you do porn you are more likely to commit sexual crimes.
Porn is not harmless and is linked to violent crime.
oh wait this isn't google.
I find it interesting that common Mormons, who are so sexually repressed, think they know more about this than researchers with decades of training and experience in researching these issues. What ever happened to being humble and teachable?
I think the points of criticism here are valid, but nevertheless there is something to be said about making something taboo and thereby promoting it. One can teach virtuous lessons about sex without making it so secretive and curious that you create more interest by not talking about the topic at all or in only a very cryptic sense. Unfortunately, that is a difficult balance for many to strike.
Exactly what is your definition of sexually repressed? Just thought you'd do a little Mormon bashing while you could? Never once have I thought I was sexually repressed. But since you say I am, then I guess I'm sexually repressed. How ridiculous can you be. Save comments of a persons sexual nature for the porn sites.
Pornography is not something to laugh about, it is not harmless, nor is it a natural, uncontrollable desire that people have. It is fake, un-natural, and destructive to everybody that is involved.
There is nothing positive or good about this. It destroys families, causes harm to marital relationships, and embarrasses and shames those who are involved at any level.
I appreciate this article because it points out and brings to mind the reckless and cruel manner in which this danger is being published. We should see pornography for what it is, not be glib or trivial about it and have the courage to stand up to it.
I can only control what I do. Every thing else is beyound my control.
"Boobs...
Oh wait, this isn't google" CLASSIC!!!
By the way, to claim Utah/SLC is the porn capital of the nation - give me a break. That is the stupidest claim I have heard yet. LOL
This is Zion man - I guarantee that is not the case.
All of you, sign a hymn!!!
Give me a break. The biggest category of rape is date rape. Are you telling me that date rape is not about sex? That's the most ludicrous thing I've ever heard. The guy is randy, he doesn't care much about the girl, and forces himself on her. It does not revolve around violence. Porn fuels passions and the passions fuel wanting them satisfied.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Redgraves recreates grandma in play 12:21 p.m.
- Can 65 be considered young now? 12:14 p.m.
- Marriage: having each other's back 12:13 p.m.
- Presidential libraries open history 12:04 p.m.
- Know any RMs playing in the FBS? 11:52 a.m.
- Dead Poets Society founder on tour 11:51 a.m.
- Considering adoption? 11:49 a.m.
- Social events become solitary 11:43 a.m.
- USA Today poll 11:33 a.m.
- US says sanctions possible for Iran 11:13 a.m.
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
359 - BYU happy to escape with victory
212 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
200 - TCU creams U.
184 - Will state consider gay rights law?
148 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
131 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
130 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Celtics crush Jazz
104 - RSL heads to MLS title game
100
How do you handle kids and contests? Our oldest daughter, 7, is of the...
Earlier this year, my family and I went to San Diego, for an early,...
Sears is holding a special VIP night Sunday, Nov. 15, in stores and online.
Thanks, Deseret News, for printing a story that is not a one-sided...
Why did the Deseret News change this article?
Interesting that the two rookies played four years in college. Like Duncan,...
"...why not say you only rent out to married couples and not to cohabiters...
First, I think the focus on gay rights is way out of proportion to those who...
bertandearnie - just to correct your statistics. 90% of child pornographers...
I'm not that concerned with languages being lost. In fact, I'd love it if...
It would have helped us to have the yewts win, but I'll have to admit, after...
was out of town for the game did not know what happened to Diamonte ??? and...
This is why they need, at the least, a "plus one" game. Match up TCU and...

