Deseret News | Reader comments: Interfaith Alliance chief urges Mitt Romney to give a 'JFK speech'

Reader comments
Interfaith Alliance chief urges Mitt Romney to give a 'JFK speech'

122 comments | Read story

Page:
1
2
3
Next >

Anonymous | 8:54 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I'm not saying that I'm even a Romney supporter (yet) but people need to get over themselves. Here are some famous Mormons in the mainstream; Steve Young (people all over--not just in Utah admired him as a man of character), Vern Law (same thing), Vance Law (same thing), Dale Murphy (same thing). In politics Mormons have served such as Ezra Taft Benson (Sec. of Agriculture for Pres. Eisenhower), Orrin Hatch, Harry Reid (a Democrat--gasp!), and many, many others including Mitt's father George Romney, the Governor of Michigan way back when in the 1960's.

Bottom line--it's time to get over this religious crap and judge a man by his character and accomplishments (MLK said about the same thing). I actually believe Mitt does okay on those things. However, the religious right of the Republican core may kill his chances because of their own intolerant and ignorant views on religion. Perhaps this guy is right int the sense that Romney needs to explain himself but in reality he shouldn't have to. His record of running an ethical business, a successful Olympiad and a decent tenure as a Republican Governor of Mass. should be enough to evaluate him among the other candidates.

Lance S | 9:07 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

What a crock. This guy is a piece of work. The Southern Baptists have been one of the main fountains misinformation about Mormons for decades. Now, this guy wants Romeny to "clear up" the confusion.

Moreover, that bit about Romney showing his commitment to "separation of church and state" is laugh riot also. Most Evangelical Christians are desperate for more crossing and blurring of that line, not less.

Bottom line, Romney is a Mormon. If that is the sole basis for your rejection of him as a candidate, then you are bigot. If you want to reject him as a candidate, do it based on his politics, not his religion.

Elizabeth | 9:16 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I don't feel that we as Americans have asked any other of the polictical runners for this explanation, why are we insisting Mitt Romney do this. This nation was built on the very fiber of being able to worship any faith, this man is a pillar of his community, does service to his country and has and is successful in business. He has tried many times to answer questions on his faith, why does he have to repeatedly do this??? Are you people listening or are you all awaiting for him to say something that you want him to say? Listen up America, out of all the people running on the Republican side, he is honest, and has not had to admit being an adulter, he believes in man and woman marriages, he believes he can without a shadow of a doubt be fair with all other (no matter what faith they believe in) and to create a unified country. We are not all of his faith, but I am certain by listening to him intently, that he wants to make our country great again. Separate religion from government, that is what everyone says, but they don't really mean it...

Comments continue below

Alan | 9:17 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Why is it that the media, evangelical Republicans, and "orthodox" Christians insist only Romney explain his faith? Perhaps these people should be expected to explain THEIR beliefs that a Mormon is somehow a questionable candidate. Isn't it time people who truly believe in freedom of worship lay down the expectation that those who oppose a Mormon (or a Catholic, or a Jew, or a Muslim) in the White House explain their bigotry? Why don't we demand that those who would exclude someone based on their faith confront the issue of religious elitism?

Neither Romney nor any other candidate owe America or the world any explanation for believing what they believe, so long as their beliefs value the dignity of human life and protection of human rights. (Romney's do.)

What we ALL owe ourselves is an explanation for why we would look down our nose at someone whose faith differs from our own, in any situation.

Kate | 9:22 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Being from the Baptist Belt, alot of misinformation is because of the false preachings of other religions. I grew up of a non-LDS faith, and people love a reason to hate, especially when it comes to a religion different from their own. I don't know if talking about religion will do anything because like I said, people love a reason to hate, and regardless of what Romney says, they will continue to do so.

Well.... | 9:28 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Well...he probably does have to give a speech discussing what he believes. The REALITY, like it or not, is that many American have a negative view of the church, based on polygamy, the early church leaders, the blacks in the priesthood thinge, etc. There is not much that can be done to make people feel OK about most of those things. They happened, it looked weird, because, well, it was. The best he can do is say we don't do those things anymore and hope people can get over it. I hope he can get people to get over it, but I doubt it. I don't think an LDS person will ever be able to run for a national office and win. Too much historical baggage.

re: lance | 9:28 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Why shouldnt Romney welcome the opportunity to set the record straight?

NOTROMNEY | 9:38 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I really hope LDS members don't vote for Romney simply because he is Mormon. My parents, my in-laws, friends , they al are voting for this guy for his religion. Take a look at his politics people. He flip-flops enough to where I won't vote for him. I am LDS, hold a temple recommend, but I will not go to hell for NOT voting for this guy.

Hombre.de.steele | 9:41 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Marriner Stoddard Eccles was also a Mormon and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank from 1934 to 1948. A man noted for his integrity and character. Oh, and commitment to the constitution???? Who else believes that the Constitution is a God inspired document, delivered to us by wise men for the '...protection of all flesh, according to just and holy principles'???

Big Al | 9:43 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I am active LDS, and spent many years living in Virginia and Georgia, and most my neighbors and acquaintances were Southern Baptists. Wonderful people, but they suffered from "institutional bigotry", largely because of their religious leaders, who many times attempted to teach me what Mormons really believe. Rev. Gaddy is only attempting to hide his own bigotry behind a lot of politically correct language. I agree with others--what confusion is there to "clear up" about Romney's religious beliefs? It just galls the Christian right that a religion they have spent so much time and money bashing could end up being represented in the White House.

Elizabeth | 9:45 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Amen to Lance S comments! All too often bigotryand ignorance is a matter of "Look who's calling the kettle black." We're all guilty at one time or another but this "weakness" should not be reflected in who we elect to any office.

Keith R. Wood | 9:48 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

So, the "Reverend" C. Wilton Gaddy says that Mitt Romney is going to have to "confront the confusion in his faith" -- but the only confusion is coming from Gaddy and others like him.

You have to look way down in the fifth paragraph to discover that Gaddy hosts a show on "Air America." That is the left-wing talk network, that has listener numbers so low that they have to steal money from the Boys' and Girls' Clubs to pay radio stations to carry their shows.

This makes the comments look like just more attempts to muddy the waters, especially when Gaddy ignores the minor little detail that, in fact, Romney DID meet with Protestant ministers, months ago.

While I can understand a political activist such as Gaddy disregarding facts which get in his way, why does the reporter not mention that?

For that matter, why is the Deseret Morning News paying any attention to what is essentially just a press release from a political action committee? The stated goal of the Interfaith Alliance is to "fight the religious right," according to their website, which they do by condemning Republicans, while not saying one word against left-wing, pro-abortion candidates.

Jim B. | 9:49 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

What is there to clear up? Anyone who wants to know about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints can find all the information they want on the church website at www.lds.org
As for how his religion will affect his presidency; I tend to think it will affect his presiidency in the same manner it has affected his whole life in that it will help him to continue to be the same upstanding, moral citizen he has always been. Look at his record and you will see there is nothing to hide.
We all want a capable President we can trust. This is the man.

Trey | 9:51 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

The reason while Mr. Ronney needs to "clear up" the Mormon issue is because the evangelicals have clouded the issue and muddied the waters. To not vote for Mr. Romney over religion will cost the religious right the chance to have a pro-life, pro traditional marriage candidate. Otherwise it is going to be Billary or Guiliani. And though I would vote for Rudy over Billary, many evangelicals won't, given our country the 4 worst years in american political history. This lady will be a mixture of LBJ, Nixon and a crazy socialist. Atleast Utah voters and most of the midwest know who to vote for.

confront? | 9:52 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

"Confront"???? Are we on trial here? What is there to "confront" about belief in God? I never have heard anyone asking Steve Young or any other person in the media, who may be LDS, to confront their religion. Listen to conference old boy. Find out what we confront.

Mc | 9:53 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

It must be galling for a Baptist to find that the only presidential candidate who espouses values important to Baptists with a chance to actually win is a member of a church that Baptists have vehemently preached aginst for generations. They are calling desperately for Mitt to persuade them that he won't use the presidency to promote Mormonism. That fear is the only thing that may keep them from supporting someone that stands for their values more than the other top tier candidates.

David b. | 10:01 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I find it really funny that he wants a statement from Romney about separation of church and state when the religious right doesn't seem to believe there is one.

GOP SUPPORTER | 10:11 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT ON THE MERITS OF THEIR OWN DOCTRINES, i.e. BEING BORN AGAIN HAD THE LIKES OF JIMMY CARTER, BILL CLINTON AND GW BUSH AS MEN THEY COULDNT QUESTION AS A RESULT OF THEIR PROFESSION AS CHRISTIANS! WOW WHAT A THREESOME- WHY CAN'T AMERICA SEE THAT THE FAR RIGHT IS BAFOONERY!!!!
WHAT A JOKE!!!
MITT HAS AS MUCH OR MORE FAITH THEN ANY CANDIDATE
OH BY THE WAY HIS FAITH IS CENTERED IN JESUS CHRIST
THE PROBLEM WITH THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT IS THEY REALLY BELIEVE THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES TRULY WORSHIPING JESUS!

former Mass resident | 10:21 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I lived in Massachusetts when Romney was elected governor. The state was liberal enough not to make such a big deal of his religion. The religious issues come from conservative people. I know a lot of Mormons who say that religion shouldn't matter in politics, but then I ask them if they would vote for an atheist and they hesitate... The fact is there are a lot of principled, honest, and good atheists who would make fine presidents too. I think that many conservatives, like Mormons, would eventually get comfortable voting for just such an atheist, but it would take time. They would have to overcome their biases against atheists.

My main concern about Romney is that as President he would have to appeal to this intolerant/close-minded conservative base during his administration. I used to be Republican, but I'll vote Democrat now because the conservative base is too far out of touch and we need to empower the Democrats to work on health car, environment, immigration, etc.

Well Said Lance S | 10:21 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

There is only one type of bigotry that is still allowed and accepted in the US and that is prejudice against Mormons. Heaven forbid we even mention that Hillary may not be qualified because she is a woman or Obama because he is black. You would hear the screams and cries to the ends of the earth if that were the case and labeled a bigoted hate monger. It is time we as Mormons stand up for ourselves and stop being so non-confrontational when others obviously cross the line from curiosity to bigotry. Didn't Jesus show righteous idignation when he drove the money changers from the temple? We so often want to take the high road and just let things be. Why don't we stand up and defend our beliefs and demand that our beliefs be given the same respect as any other?

SCTrojan | 10:25 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

It is disingenuous of Southern Baptist, Bible Belter evangelicals to claim that ANY member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (especially Gov. Romney) needs to clarify their position as a Christian or justify their religion in any way.

Last weeks LDS Conference (which was broadcast worldwide) completely clarified any questions that these people could possibly have. The Mormons go out of their way to teach their beliefs to anyone who will listen..... they just haven't listened.

Bill | 10:35 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I think that the real issue here is that conservative Christians want to support someone with Romney's values, but don't want to admit that Mormons are Christians. If they support Romney they would have to confront an issue that they have been turning a blind eye to for years. Their form of Christianity does not allow Mormons to be Christians. Ironic, isn't it, that the Gospel of inclusion that Jesus preached allows such behavior

Values | 10:40 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Mc, Gaddy's values are NOT those of the vast majority of Baptists. He is a liberal talk show host who opposes most of what the Baptists stand for. In other words, he's a Baptist like Harry Reid is a Mormon.

What galls Gaddy is that there are millions of people in this country who DO hold those values, and most of them vote for more conservative Democrats or for Republicans.

Jake M. | 10:52 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

In response to the comments of Lance S, the Rev. Gaddy is not a Southern Baptist and has repudiated what he seems to consider dogmatism in American politics. His suggestion that Mitt Romney clear up misconceptions about his religion seems thoughtful and reasonable since most Americans don't have much of a clue about Mormons.

And to Trey--Midwesterners don't have a consistent history of voting along the same line as Utahns. Maybe he is thinking of the South.

Jim P | 10:54 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

It never ceases to amaze me. Most LDS members display the same bigotry they complain about. One can only imagine the level of support LDS church members would afford a non-christian presidential candidate (i.e. muslim, buddist, atheist, agnostic, etc.). As for Mr. Gaddy and his ilk, they don't think mormons are christians. They're bigoted against non-christians. They believe they have a monopoly on the truth and would prefer someone who
they believe is inspired of god be president.

Rich | 11:00 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

What is Romney supposed to do? Recite the Articles of Faith? So-called Christian bookstores stock volumes dedicated to proving that Mormons don't really believe the Articles of Faith, pulling obscure quotes from long-dead Mormon leaders totally out of context, contending among other things that Mormons still believe in practicing polygamy and worship Adam as their God. Look at all those who ignore historical evidence while claiming that Brigham Young was behind the Mountain Meadows Massacre. Nothing Romney can say will end such bigotry. Why do the Southern Baptists say Mormons believe in a different God and a different Jesus than they do? It's because Mormons believe the Bible when it says that Jesus is the son of God, that his father sent him here to atone for the sins of mankind, and Mormons believe Jesus when he demanded certain behavior of his followers (faith without works is dead). Because Mormons do not accept the Nicene Creed, which was written under political pressure and is accepted by most Christians today, they are said not to be considered Christian in the historical sense.

Romney supporter? | 11:15 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I actually think that whatever this ministers background or motivation is, his idea is not a bad one.

The topic of the proposed speech was not the LDS faith it was "How will that faith affect the way he governs America?". I think this is a valid question for several reasons. Someone already mentioned several of the prominent members of the church and the fact that they have differing political views, this to me both creates confusion and provides evidence of the political flexibility of the LDS faith. I think the reason that none of the other candidates have been asked to explain the relationship between their religion and their politics is first, because few of them practice their faith to the extent that Brother Romney does and second, because like it or not Mormons are viewed as different from most other Christians. I think that a well written, sincere speech that addressed this matter with conviction could only help the Romney campaign, and I hope he decides to do it.

Shawn Lindsay | 11:21 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I can just see our teachers in our schools: "You can become anything you want in this life, maybe even president (except for you, you, and you because you're Mormon)."

Romney supporter? | 11:26 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

RE: NOTROMNEY

I would really like someone to tell me why being a "flip-flopper" is so bad.

Why can't an educated person change his mind?

Do we expect our elected officials to go into office and close their mind and stop thinking about issues?

Unfortunately I believe that is what we have forced our representatives to do. That is why they appear to behave as a bunch of mindless idiots, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT WE EXPECT THEM TO DO!!!!! Changing your mind on an issue has almost become a sort of political suicide and I think it is a shame on the American people for alowing ourselves to think this way.

Anonymous | 11:27 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

How about examining Barack Obama--his congregational leadership or church has said some pretty wacky things. But really Obama,like Romney, should be judged on their character, their stands on the issues, their proven achievements...period!

William | 11:28 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Did Kennedy stop being a Catholic while he was president? No!He continued being Catholic. Have not all presidents belonged to a religious group or had religious convictions? Did any or all of them make or need to make a special, and apparently necessary, if we believe Rev. Gaddy, speech? Why did Kennedy feel the need to make his speech? Did he really think that there were enough people in this country that felt that there was a danger that he would take orders from the Pope on matters concerning the nation? Maybe so. Rev. Gaddy, what makes you think that just making a "Kennedy" speech will calm the fears of paranoid Americans? Is there a fear of religion in the minds of most Americans? Is religion something to fear? I believe in the separation of church and state, and I believe that Romney and every other public servant in this country also belives in it.

religion | 11:33 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Why don't all the presidential candidates need to make a "JFK speech?" Aren't there other people running for president with religious affiliations? Should those people have to make a speech stating they will run the United States as a "citizen" and not as a protestant, or catholic, etc? Why is it such a big deal Romney must make a statement, and other religious candidates don't need to?

Matthew R | 11:35 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I disagree that Mitt is a flip flopper. Pres Ronald Reagen as govenor of CA was prochoice. I also think from time to time it is good to see somemone change their mind. We all learn new things and sometimes that requires us to change our minds. I'll definitely be voting for Mitt, not because he is LDS because he is the real deal. I would never ever vote for Ried who is of questionable marbles. God bless Mitt Romney.

TLW | 11:39 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Regardless of whether or not the LDS church has been viewed in a negative light should have nothing to do with Mitt's ability to govern. Has he used his governorship to promote Mormonism? Mitt is trying to show that he is focusing on the political aspect although he chooses to be LDS. If he has to give a statement about his religion and how his beliefs either will affect or not affect his potential presidency, then so too should Hillary, Guilliani, and any other candidate have to give a statement about how their religous views will affect thier potential presidency.

Mike G. Shirra | 11:43 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

This entire religious "litmus test" discussion is SAD. This is supposed to be America. We are supposed to have seperation of Church and State and freedom of religion. What right do these religious elitests have to say that Mitt Romney has to "confront" his religious background? They should go and confront their own! They are the ones who have for decades tried to confuse people about what Mormons believe anyway. They are religious pinko communists! Romney is the most intelligent, most accomplished and most honest one in the field. He has the most progressive vision for American.

Religious right hypocracy is cutting off their nose to spite their face, couching their hate behind "oh, we don't understand his religion - he needs to explain himself." To who and why? because you are not a Mormon? The information is out there on what they believe.. It's strange that hate and bigotry have couched themselves in the self-rightousness of people who feel justified in their religious superiority. It is the most un-Christian example of prejudice I've ever whitnessed. I am voting for Mitt Romney. I want the America back that I love.

Michael | 11:56 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I really appreciate the comment which struck me the most of what I have read so far; the comment by Keith R. Wood. Just be commenting on a topic you are influencing and adding credibility to it. I must ask myself why this Rev C Wilson Gaddy is given any credibility himself? What has he done? Has he governed a state successfully? Has he raised a good family and been faithful to his wife? Does he have anything better to do than prop himself into the judgement seat of all who run for political office of this country? Last time I checked there was no legitimate reason to question anything about Mitt Romney's character or personal life. To quote Mitt himself he said, "I think people are more interested in a man's position on the issues than where he goes to church." Given our choices of candidates and their proven history I am voting for Mitt Romney hands down. I strongly encourage all to do some personal research and look at the issues and vote based upon this and your conscience not because of someone's religion whether you belong to it, or agree with it, or not. God Bless America!

Anonymous | 11:59 a.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Religion and a few other thigs should just be left out period!

What!? | 12:04 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Mitt's political problems have nothing to do with the religious right. They have somewhat to do with his perceived flip flopping, but that's not the primary issue either.

His problem is the viewpoint of the average american when it comes to his religion. I'm not saying it's right...but it is true.

The average american knows very little about mormonism and they don't really care to. What they DO know is that mormons are a bit weird. They know that mormons believe that JS was a prophet who talked with god, and that mormons believe their current leader is a prophet who talks with god.

They also know that mormons have temples where they do secret rites, wear strange underwear, polygamy figures in somewhere, have different sorts of dietary habits and in general are not your average religious practitioner.

This leaves the average american with a bit of a queasy feeling about mormonism and mormons in general...although most folks consider mormons to be good people.

They're not going to support a mormon for pres.

They don't understand mormonism...but they know that it's sorta weird...and they know that "they" are considered outsiders by insider mormons.

Brenda | 12:07 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I look for a candidate who lives what he/she professes to believe. If a professed Christian, then I expect him to live the 10 commandments. He shouldn't have to tell us how or if he's going to let his religion morals ditate his presidency; his life should show it. Romney's life reflects his convictions. This tells me that if he professes to believe in patriotism and the constitution, his actions will follow. Kennedy claimed Catholism, but did not live it. Guiliani's and (Bill)Clinton's moral actions also do not reflect what they profess to believe. It does not matter to me what religion our president follows, but I expect him/her to be true to it. We need integrity in the White House, not hypocracy.

Anonymous | 12:09 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I think the point is not just the religion. Mormons are often perceived as religious zealots and the Church is a well organized united group that spans so many nations. The perception of those outside the church is, "If that is the case how can there be seperation of church and state if we elect this man?" The perceptions may be right or wrong. But even a great leader like JFK had to deal with it and he did well answering it. Maybe those calling for the speach have other motives but it doesn't mean that the speach doesn't need to happen. People are right that we should vote for this man because of his politics not for his religion. I am Mormon and I haven't made any decisions regarding this man or his politics yet. Nor have I made any full opinions of any candidates. Right or wrong such a frank and straight-forward address should be made, though I think Mitt can make it on his own terms in a forum he chooses and not lose the effect of it.

Jake M. | 12:08 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I think readers (who may not have actually read the Rev. Gaddy's remarks) are mistaken in painting him with the Christian Right brush. He has NOT promoted such hateful rhetoric. Gaddy rejected (and left) the Southern Baptist Convention because he considered their policies and brand of political activism to be un-Christian. (There ARE other kinds of Baptists besides the Southern Baptist Convention whose beliefs and policies differ greatly from the SBC.) I don't think you will find Gaddy among those who brand Mormons as non-Christian.

Anonymous | 12:29 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

If religion isn't the point then why is it brought up constantly?

Robert | 12:40 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

"Mormon Issue" I didn't realize that there was an issue with the Mormons. Since when is there a religous test those who wish to be our leaders? I'm not quizzed on what beliefs I have for a job application. Why should Presidentail canidates be quizzed on what their religious beliefs are every where they go for their "job interviews" with the people.

Personally, Romney has my vote. Not because of the the faith he chooses to follow but because of his performace with organizing the Salt Lake Winter Games and what he was able to accmplish as Govenor of MA.

Disclaimer: I am a member of the LDS fatih and my missionary service was in MA.

ex-communicated | 12:46 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

oh shucks can't run now and who cares about his polygamy ancestors..many of the bible people treating this guy like he should be ostrasized need remember the principles they preach themselves. He lives the law of the land and that is good enough. I am glad to see him running as he doesn't have the guile of some of them. Won't vote for him but I like his family involvement but would like to see him in a debate with the morman democrat who was at BYU...now ain't that AMERICA!

Mike | 12:55 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

The idea that people will vote against a religion, gender or race is as absurd to me as voting for a religion, gender or race. This type of voting behavior is dumber than voting for your party simply because it's your party. When will people begin to see that the issues are what we are supposed to vote for, not a stereotype.

John | 1:08 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

I assume and certainly hope, that Mitt Romney or his aides read all these earlier comments. It is very refreshing to see that in most cases people feel that one's religion/faith or lack of it, should not be the criterion for presidential candidates.

It should be their 'character' which counts and that includes most of the Christian virtues. As others have asked, why is Mitt singled out?

I am not a registered Republican but would vote for Mitt if the election was today. I think he has great character traits.

Ben Williams | 1:14 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Great point Brenda! I too look to the candidates to see if they are true to what they believe, no matter the religion.

M.M. | 1:20 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

The evil that men do is highlighted by the media.
The good is often buried under labels..so it is with Romney.
When the scandal laden 2002 S.L.Olympics was embarrassing our nation, Romney stepped in and turned it into a showcase. Yet Romney is a MORMON. (and certainly a MOROMON cannot be President)

Romney won the governorship of Mass. as a Republican, yes, in a State that gives us Ted K.
He saved that state from fiscal disaster, something our whole U.S. could use. (yet, Romney is a MORMON and certainly a MORMON CANNOT be President)

Unlike most politicians, Romney has remained faithful to his wedding vows, and by doing so he has blessed his children and the whole community.
(Yet Romney is a MORMON and surely a MORMON cannot
be President)

Romney's faith group is respected by governments throughout the world, teaches that the our Constitution is divinely inspired, teaches love & compassion for all, provides millions of aid throughout the world and is given freely.

There are differences in all people and religions,
But, Romney is not running for Rabbi, Pope, Imam,
Pastor, or Minister.
HE IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!

Richard G. | 1:26 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Oooooh! A Mormon vs. Baptist catfight. Us atheists love it!!!!

John | 1:26 p.m. Oct. 11, 2007

Let's not judge him by his religon. Please look at another rich father's boy, hedge fund CEO, and a man of privilage. Sound familar not another Bush Jr. PLEASE! Hedge fund operator's are in part responsible for decline of the American worker.please forgive my gammar.

Page:
1
2
3
Next >

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.