Reader comments
Utah's property-tax system isn't broken
9 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
33 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Letters: Rights of conscience
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







The sell price should be your tax base, with a 1 or 2% each year for inflation. plus any improvements you have made. The buyer of your house gets the tax base for what he paid for your home. This way everyone has the same tax base, based on what they are willing to pay for a home or can afford to pay for a home.
Utah's property tax system is indeed broken.
In my opinion, most taxes ought to be abolished in favor of sending to individuals one bill for our individual share to support national, state, and local government functions. I would bet that would put an abrupt reverse to voter apathy in this country!
I'm curious about the fact that the Bountiful area has not been re-assessed for a decade. Is this true? If so, that means those people have been relatively under assessed for the past few years as property values have increased dramatically. If their valuations are only now being realigned with the market, then they have nothing to complain about. They've been paying LESS than they should have for the past several years.
I agree with the others who have said that ALL counties need to get with it and reevaluate every property on a yearly basis. With today's technology, it really shouldn't be that big of a problem. At the very least, they should keep ALL properties on the same schedule. It is clearly unfair to reassess one part of town in one year while allowing others to slide by, especially if it happens to be during a period of fast appreciation.
It is foolish to allow someone to tax you on what THEY think YOUR property MIGHT be worth.
Would you accept a grade in school on how smart your teacher thought you were?
Tax me on reality...not someone elses hopes and dreams!
Let's move toward a "use" tax. Our current system creates incentives for going into to debt and disincentives for saving money. Helping to lead us in a direction that is not economically wise. We should reverse the trend. Let interest provide the incentives to save rather than borrow. Sure borrowing is necessary in cases, but the interest system should make us do the right thing.
Tax me for the money I spend -- tier it if necessary -- make luxury purchases like boats and ATVs get a higher tax rate than necessities like food.