Reader comments
Becker, Buhler to face off
107 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
102 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












Will support Buhler in November too.
I like Dave and will vote for him in the final election because I believe he is best qualified.
PS. About the mention of religion, the official "handbook" of the very first Utah Territorial Legislature listed not only each electe official's name, city and party but also a code "m" or "g" for mormon or gentile. (and, surprisingly even in the 1850's there were a significant number of non-mormon elected officials in SLC.) I guess Utah will never get past mentioning a candidate's religion, but I doubt it will ever dictate who we elect.
By the way, Buhler is not anti-gay! He supported a bill to get every household fair rights with regards to employment benefits (which includes gay couples). This coming from a so-called Conservative; he seems pretty open minded and fair to me (which is not to say that Conservatives can not be these things, just seems to be the generalization).
I am excited to see the outcome. Personally, I would welcome either into the Mayor's seat, even though I prefer Buhler because of his proven track-record and strong ties to education. I think both are positive people running positive campaigns and will continue to bring that trait into office with them.
I just hope (sigh) that Buhler being somewhat conservative is not creating auto responses from the liberal side (or republican for that matter!). This always seems to be a huge deal to voters here- probably heightened because of our President. We need to remember to look at the issues and successes of the person rather than grouping them into a category with someone just because of their party affiliation and our feelings towards it (or because of the unpopular person in the White House). Dave Buhler is not that person and not all conservatives share the President's ideals. Please vote fairly!
Best of luck to both!! =)
In my mind, this decision is not difficult at all. I think Becker should (and judging by the primary numbers will) win in a landslide.