Dave | 7:46 a.m. Sept. 9, 2007
If you think thats politicians can get to the bottem of this, I have some beach property in So. utah I would like to sell you.
Dianne in Ohio | 10:33 a.m. Sept. 9, 2007
Grandstanding is what politicians due best. [I've read your own Gov.has done a little "grandstanding" when it comes to his family business].Should there be an investigation into this mine disaster, you betcha! We all need answers to improve all mining safety. But listen to ALL the evidence. The miners who were working the Crandall Canyon Mine would be a good place to start. Several of those miners have written in these comment pages that safety was as good or better here than most other mines. Listen to what they have to say, even if they do not agree with each other. Good solutions will come from disagreement. In your writtings you are trying to put forth blame on MSHA & Mr Murray. The many articles I read in the Des News stated both Murray & MSHA worked long and diligently to recover these entombed miners. MSHA lost one of their men and Mr Murray was literally digging with his bare hands to rescue the three rescuers. These deeds do not show safety factors or the lack there of but it does show the caring for these miners. What I am telling you is this; the facts need to come out for future safety of all miners. Let these men testify who knows the "real" circumstances" they worked in but you placing the blame at this time is not appropriate.
Anonymous | 2:38 p.m. Sept. 9, 2007
You murder for passion there's capital punishment. If you murder out of greed you get fined and your life goes on. This is what conservatives value for American justice.
Comments continue below
Desert Rat | 4:51 p.m. Sept. 9, 2007
Murder for greed? Did someone force those miners into the Crandall Canyon mine?

Sure Murray has been defensive about the problem in his mine. Most anybody would, knowing that the Hero of Chappaquiddick is chomping at the bit awaiting his opportunity to blovate in the inevitable hearings. The amount of wisdom that will emerge from the hearings is inversely related to the self-importance of those conducting them.
retire miner | 10:37 p.m. Sept. 9, 2007
I think your right were are the co owners ipp has never been mentioned oh yeah thats the other co owner the one thats never mentioned well heres an idea lets hear from the engineer that signed off on the plans or the mine superintendent that worked there every day put them on the stand so the truth can come out much easyer to blame murray and msha.
Rosie | 9:28 a.m. Sept. 10, 2007
If Murray is a co-owner of the mine, where is the other co-owner and why haven't we heard from them?

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Deseret Morning News Archives

previousnext

Latest comments

Class takes fear out of Web surfing

As a real service to others in the community (I know several) you could:...

I love watching Chambers on the underneath crossing route - he has had some...

USU shows clear improvment

Anderson will leave for more money. Who really cares because nobody will be...

Great article. I love the BYU-Utah rivalry and everything that leads up to...

Josh Powell provides DNA sample

look at all these posts! I'd guess they mostly come from workers sitting at...

I really do not know what I am talking about. The Jazz are terrible. I am...

@mark I'll recognize your point next summer, when I see you diligently...

Healthcare is a need. Not a want. How would your religious leader rate...

Might be time to think about a mascot name change, just a thought

'Some gays take offense when their sexuality is called a moral issue, while,...

Advertisements