Reader comments
Jordan to answer district-split questions

Unbiased? | 8:17 a.m. Aug. 30, 2007

I question how Jordan District will be able to provide an "objective and honest" report. Christensen shows his own biased even in this article by referring to the consolidation of districts and how he doesn't have a lot to go on. There is plenty of information on the benefits of smaller school districts if he only cares to look. Here's a start: http://www.smallerschools.org/smallDistricts.php

Unbiased Indeed! | 11:02 a.m. Aug. 30, 2007

It's not like smallerschools.org is unbiased!

Bias | 10:01 p.m. Aug. 30, 2007

It's hard to find bias-free anything in this discussion. A Pros/Cons (totally biased but from both sides) voter information pamphlet is likely the best route.

Comments continue below

Chuck | 7:53 a.m. Aug. 31, 2007

If I were a Jordan District Administrator, instead of fighting the inevitable, I would be trying to position myself in whichever community district I wanted to become a part of, rather than offending them.

Anonymous | 9:39 a.m. Aug. 31, 2007

They are all going to lose their jobs thats what they are worried about

Anonymous | 6:17 p.m. Aug. 31, 2007

I think the Jordan School District administrators need to be very kind to the patrons, they will all be looking for new jobs very soon, and will find it very hard to find a nicely padded job they are all accustomed to. Board members really need to think about making the taxpayers mad with that nice pay hike also. All this stays in our minds when we vote.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.