Reader comments
Charters head west 58 independent schools open doors this year
5 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- School social worker aims to right...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Parking lot gun bill would apply to...
- Penn class teaches students how to...
- No discipline planned at North Dakota...
- Noted US Latino scholar 'forgotten'...
- Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
In News
Across Site
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Teaching the art and science of...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
- 10 states receive NCLB waivers, Utah...
- Teachers underpaid? Some say they are...
- Sex ed bill amended, impact unclear...
- Penn class teaches students how to...
- School social worker aims to right...
In News
Across Site
- DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Utah students outperform in AP tests
11 - Sex ed bill amended, impact unclear
8 - Penn class teaches students how to...
6 - Sex ed bill fight not over
6 - Parking lot gun bill would apply to...
6 - Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
5 - Is technology making us stupid?
5 - Bill to eliminate tenure fails
4 - Courtroom closed in bomb plot case
4












The K-6 charter school is the first of its kind in the state and opted to forgo federal start-up funding, around $150,000, so it could give preference to Spanish-speaking students.
I wonder how much good press would be given if the statement about enrollment was "SO IT COULD GIVE PREFERENCE TO ENGLISH SPEAKING (non Hispanic) STUDENTS"
At the same time, I applaud the school for forgoing a little in federal funds so as to run things as they see fit, even if it isn't exactly as I would run things.
I think local control and local funding are ESSENTIAL if we hope to have good government schools.
In any event, so much for the allegations that charter schools only serve "the rich." Similarly, there are many lower income and/or minority parents who care enough about education to make the sacrifices to pay for private school.
The statement by Joel "so it could give preference to Spanish-speaking students" may have been misquoted or misunderstood, but I assure you it is not accurate. The dual immersion model requires a 50% balance between primary English and Spanish speakers. The school did not forego the funding to give preference to anyone. The federal funds mentioned were not sought after so that the school could stay true to the dual immersion model, which would have been almost impossible to do under the requirments of the federal funding.
I'm happy to clarify my comment above. The population I was referring to was the Glendale and West Side neighborhoods, which have relatively fewer charter schools to choose from than other parts of Utah. Charter Schools need to offer an "alternative" to the typical public school in their surrounding neighborhood. The "alternative education" that Dual Immersion has chosen to offer is a unique opportunity to be educated in a bi-lingual atmosphere that should allow their students to become fluent in both Spanish and English. This is a skill that will be very useful in our global economy, and will likely also be very useful in Utah given current demographic trends. I strongly support the idea of parental control of schools, and allowing a wide variety of approaches so long as they also adequately teach the Utah Core Curriculum.