Deseret News | Reader comments: Would oil shale require coal-fired plants?

Reader comments
Would oil shale require coal-fired plants?

Douglas | 7:35 a.m. Aug. 27, 2007

Sounds great if it didn't need so much water and would tear our countryside apart, let alone what it would do to our air quality. I think it's sad enough that I'm advised to not eat trout I catch in a stream. At what point will we stop chasing oil?

Dave | 7:51 a.m. Aug. 27, 2007

So we are to believe there is plenty of water to grow and produce bio-fuels, but none to develope oil-shale?

Coluber | 10:43 a.m. Aug. 27, 2007

Oil shale requires a large amount of energy to render it into a fuel. If you spend a barrel's worth of energy to get a barrel and a quarter back (just to pick some figures), some might say that's a good deal. But at what price? Turning the Book Cliffs into the equivalent of a giant kitty-litter box? Adding more CO2 and pollution into the air? Using the water that ranchers and cities need? I think oil shale has many hidden costs that will make it unacceptable to reasonable minds.

Comments continue below

Cathy Kay | 11:31 a.m. Aug. 27, 2007

Corn and Sugar based bio-fuels are water guzzelers, therefore other energy sources such as geo-thermal, solar and wind need to be looked at. Cellulosic ethanol using switch grass and the likes would use less water and would have better options for desert areas than corn, soya and sugar beet based ethanol

Keith | 8:59 p.m. Aug. 27, 2007

Re: oil -- just a thought about oil. Don't we want to be the LAST country on earth to run out of oil, not the FIRST? Let's save what we have and focus on nuclear energy. The Idaho National Engineering Lab (INEL; now just INL) solved the nuclear waste problem about 12 years ago...oh, oops! I wasn't supposed to share that because it isn't politically correct (in the eyes of all the anti-nukes) for the general public to know a solution exists. Sorry.

James Willie | 8:13 a.m. Aug. 28, 2007

If we are going to tap this resource we have to do it in a more energy/water efficient way than tar sands are currently being exploited in Canada. A recent Department of Energy report referenced several companies that have newer technologies that may be able to efficiently process oil shale at less than $30 a barrell.. This is a resource we cannot ignore and just as we continue to make solar and other alternative technologies more viable at market rates, we need to continue to explore ways of efficiently unlocking this important resource. Whether we like it or not, we will need liquid hydrocarbons for decades to come even as we become a more energy efficient society.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.