Reader comments
ACLU, Justice support lawsuit by LDS student
46 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- More remains found in Calif. with...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Houston remembered at Clive Davis gala
- Bobby Brown on Miss. stage: 'I love...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- White House didn't foresee birth...
- Venezuelans: Will Chavez's challenger...
- Mesa man digitizes historic Ariz. images
- Federal judge, 104, mourned in Kansas
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Romney may be in danger in Michigan...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Romney adds to delegate lead with...
- Families Around the World: Romney...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Santorum sweeps caucuses
48 - Catholics' battle with Obama
45 - Gay rights and religious liberty
41 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - 'Governor Mormon'?
26 - Calif. gay marriage ban struck down
26 - Romney in trouble in Mich., beyond?
25







I do believe that this fellow did not reapply in accordance to the mandates of the scholarship.
Isn't this the facts?
OK, I can't resist. Bush is all about his political base, not civil liberties. The ACLU is about civil liberties. The Justice dept is there, not about civil liberties but about religious "rights". Sometimes, such as the case here, they overlap.
Your question can not be properly answered as it includes a falsehood.
Most that argue against the ACLU, don't argue that the ACLU doesn't defend "rights", but rather, argue that the "rights" the ACLU defend were never granted by the social contract.
The People don't want to issue those "rights" and the ACLU fights to change that.
In this case, you'll see many people typically against the ACLU, for the ACLU on this occasion.
We should not interpret this article to grant the ACLU new found respect, nor that a person typically against the ACLU should now be for the ACLU, but rather that on this on occassion the ACLU did something that many will approve.
Very much like the saying - just because a broken watch tells the right time twice in a day, doesn't mean that it is now working.